search for: shaposhnikov

...ist (or perhaps rather, ELFTypes is as close as > we have). As long as we conclude that kind of mutative model fits well here > then we should proceed. That's what I left all the cryptic "if this really > fits into the llvm-objcopy model" messages. > > *From: *Alexander Shaposhnikov <alexander.v.shaposhnikov at gmail.com> > *Date: *Thu, May 9, 2019, 6:02 PM > *To: *Jake Ehrlich > *Cc: *llvm-dev, <jh7370 at my.bristol.ac.uk>, Saleem Abdulrasool, Lang > Hames, <smeenai at fb.com>, James Henderson, Jordan Rupprecht > > Hi Jake, >> many th...

...ased > in the middle of 2014, AFAIK​). > > > Best regards, > George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc > ------------------------------ > *От:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > *Отправлено:* 2 октября 2020 г. 22:04 > *Кому:* George Rimar > *Копия:* Alexander Shaposhnikov; Richard Smith; llvm-dev; Lang Hames; > James Henderson; avl.lapshin at gmail.com > *Тема:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] preferred way to return expected > values > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:48 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> > wrote: > >> T...

.... > Is the code currently broken? - Dave > > Best regards, > George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc > ------------------------------ > *От:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > *Отправлено:* 1 октября 2020 г. 22:00 > *Кому:* George Rimar > *Копия:* Alexander Shaposhnikov; Richard Smith; llvm-dev; Lang Hames; > James Henderson; avl.lapshin at gmail.com > *Тема:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] preferred way to return expected > values > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> > wrote: > >> F...

...might be clearer) Looks like we would need to bump the minimum Clang up from 3.5 to at least 3.9 to allow returns with implicit moves that include conversions. - Dave > > > Best regards, > George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc > ------------------------------ > *От:* Alexander Shaposhnikov <alexander.v.shaposhnikov at gmail.com> > *Отправлено:* 28 сентября 2020 г. 22:46 > *Кому:* David Blaikie > *Копия:* Richard Smith; llvm-dev; Lang Hames; George Rimar; James > Henderson; avl.lapshin at gmail.com > *Тема:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] preferred way to return expect...

...out is that to proceed we *only* have to move > the MachO code into a library and we can follow up with the ELF code later > like we planned to anyway. I think that 1) goes in the correct direction > and 2) has virtually no overhead. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alexander Shaposhnikov < > alexander.v.shaposhnikov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey everyone! >> In October/November 2018 I started the implementation of llvm-objcopy for >> MachO with the long-term plan to build some popular binary-level tools on >> top of it. That effort stopped at the...

...lers supported includes those that do not implement this rule. (either > due to the language version we compile with, or due to it being a DR that > some supported compiler versions do not implement). But that's just my > rough guess. > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Shaposhnikov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello everyone! >> It looks like in the LLVM codebase (including subprojects) there are some >> inconsistencies >> in how values are returned from functions with the following (or similar) >> signatur...

...some llvm-objcopy’s features. We already have llvm-lipo, llvm-install-name-tool, llvm-strip, llvm-libtool-darwin and llvm-bitcode-strip appears to be one of the last missing tools commonly used for Mach-O. Any feedback / comments / suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Alexander Shaposhnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200820/c0bd7ef4/attachment.html>

Hey everyone! Objcopy is a powerful tool that allows one to modify object files in various manners, for example, modify symbols / symbol tables or copy / remove particular parts of a binary. It also serves as a basis for the strip tool. Currently, llvm-objcopy only supports ELF files while binutils' objcopy can handle Mach-O files as well. Besides extending the existing tool to support Mach-O

...g the files? > > Turning to practical matters, is your intent to have the load-command > rewriting code live in the tool? Or are you proposing adding support for > building/swapping/rewriting Object files to libObject? > > MDT > > > On Oct 11, 2019, at 10:31 AM, Alexander Shaposhnikov < > alexander.v.shaposhnikov at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey everyone! > Recently there has been some progress on LLVM-based tools for manipulating > MachO binaries: llvm-objcopy has been gaining a lot of important bits to > support MachO (it's relatively close to the point...

...that compilers' behaviors have changed over time, and e.g. the latest versions would use a move constructor while the older ones could use a copy constructor. So the question is where we stand at the moment / what is the recommended approach for the new code. Many thanks in advance, Alexander Shaposhnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200926/1e5bff04/attachment.html>

...nally don't like */ Try to go with the approach when llvm-lipo is a symbolic link to llvm-objcopy. This kind of bloats the codebase of llvm-objcopy, I don't see many benefits on this path except some space savings. Any thoughts/suggestions/comments would be appreciated. Kind regards, Alex Shaposhnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190509/9dba5b5f/attachment.html>

on solaris7/sparc this device doesn't exists i can use EGD but he very big (perl script!) - in memory it take about 4mb! apache use the same! why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? what alternatives exists?

Hey everyone! Recently there has been some progress on LLVM-based tools for manipulating MachO binaries: llvm-objcopy has been gaining a lot of important bits to support MachO (it's relatively close to the point where one can implement the strip-like functionality), llvm-lipo is functional and supports most of cctools' lipo options (https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-lipo.html). There

...com> wrote: > I'd give some consideration to moving the objcopy support itself into a > library inside llvm (possibly lib/Object as that makes the most sense) and > then the tool is just a thin wrapper on top of it. > > -eric > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:12 PM Alexander Shaposhnikov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hey everyone! Objcopy is a powerful tool that allows one to modify >> object files in various manners, for example, modify symbols / symbol >> tables or copy / remove particular parts of a binary. It also serves...

Hi! I've added member to a queue like this, from queues.conf: member => SIP/1070@peername It works OK. But, after restaring I see in show queue that Members: SIP/1070@peername (Invalid) ... What does it mean? Why is it Invalid? BTW, reload command fixes it, so the member receives queue calls. Thanks! PS. 1.2.9.1 -- DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet

Hello! My name is Denis Shaposhnikov. I'm looking for a job in EU (Germany is preferably) as a UNIX/FreeBSD system administrator and/or network administrator that lets me utilize my experience in an Internet Service Providing (ISP). Skills: * Operating systems: UNIX (FreeBSD 2.2 - STABLE), Cisco IOS (10.x - 12.x),...

ssh won't compile on this platform log: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" -DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh/ssh-askpass\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c atomicio.c -o atomicio.o In file included from config.h:294, from bsd-misc.h:39, from includes.h:91,

Hi Ovirt node image build problem? Node image build my system OS Fedora core 14. I am have a question about installation process of oVirt project. Install DOC : https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/wiki/Build But node-image build error? [root at Ovirt-T node]# ./autobuild.sh Running oVirt Node Autobuild test -f Makefile && make -k distclean || :

See atttachment. I have already submit this bug via "report a bug" in Nov last year, but no reply, and the problem still exist in stable-6 now. Any one who knows how to solve this problem ? Thanks... -------------- next part -------------- <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote: > Subject: /dev/urandom > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote: > > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? > > > > i think the commercial ssh uses a one time generated random > > seed file. If i remember, it asks you to bang on the keyboard until it > > gets enough entropy, like PGP. It al...