Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "shapeabl".
Did you mean:
shapeable
2004 Jan 15
3
Shaping Device Aliases
Hi.
I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does
anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future?
Anyway, for the time being the only option that seems to leave is to
fwmark packets differently for each device alias and then shape based
on that.
Is it possible to set multiple marks on the packets? Alternatively, is
it pos...
2004 Jan 29
1
RE: LARTC digest, Vol 1 #1564 - 6 msgs
...> Gordan,
>
> I''ve noticed that you are trying to use aliased IP addresses and
> traffic control together, and you are a bit frustrated that tc doesn''t
> handle aliased interface names.
>
> : > > I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not
shapeable.
> : > > Does anybody know if this functionality is planned in the
future?
> : >
> : > None of the new(er) networking tools recognise device aliases,
> : > because on all recent linux releases, aliases don''t exist.
> : > the ethX:X notation is a legac...
2004 Jan 28
1
Problems with multipath routing.
Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing
failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead,
traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as
follows:
ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1
weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250
But it does not run as I