Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "shankha".
Did you mean:
shankar
2010 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
Hi Devang,
Is there any particular reason as to why debug info support for tls
hasn't been implemented.
Is the feature in pipeline ? How hard is it to implement ?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 10:09 AM, shankha wrote:
>
> Hi Devang,
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>
> In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the
> moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet.
>
> Does that mean I will n...
2010 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
...:
> In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet.
Does that mean I will not be able to debug applications which use tls
through gdb if they are build with gcc-lllvm or clang.
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:30 AM, shankha wrote:
>
>> I do not face any issues debugging my test case. But while debugging
>> my application
>> through gdb I cannot make sense of the call stack. I do not see the
>> function names in
>> the call stack (with or without insertion of additional function calls
&...
2010 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
...If I convert global variables to thread-local variables or vice versa
at the IR stage do I have to take care of the debug metadata.
I looked at the IR generated and I couldn't find any difference
between the debug metadata generated for global variables and
thread-local variables.
--
Thanks
Shankha
2010 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
...b I cannot make sense of the call stack. I do not see the
function names in
the call stack (with or without insertion of additional function calls
or local variables).
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:28 PM, shankha <shankhabanerjee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> If I convert global variables to thread-local variables or vice versa
>> at the IR stage do I have to take care of the debug metadata.
>
> If you provide an small concrete example then it would help,
>
> Devang...
2010 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
Shankha,
AFAIK, nobody is actively working on debug info for TLS at the moment.
On Oct 13, 2010, at 3:19 PM, shankha wrote:
> Hi Devang,
> Is there any particular reason as to why debug info support for tls
> hasn't been implemented.
> Is the feature in pipeline ? How hard is it to implem...
2010 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
On Oct 12, 2010, at 4:28 PM, shankha <shankhabanerjee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> If I convert global variables to thread-local variables or vice versa
> at the IR stage do I have to take care of the debug metadata.
If you provide an small concrete example then it would help,
Devang
> I looked at the IR generated...
2010 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
On Oct 13, 2010, at 10:09 AM, shankha wrote:
> Hi Devang,
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>> In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet.
>
> Does that mean I will not be ab...
2010 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Possibility of Corruption of debug metadata
In your example, you do not need to update debug info for @global_var at the moment. We are not identifying tls in debug info yet.
On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:30 AM, shankha wrote:
> I do not face any issues debugging my test case. But while debugging
> my application
> through gdb I cannot make sense of the call stack. I do not see the
> function names in
> the call stack (with or without insertion of additional function calls
> or local variables)....
2010 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] Figuring out the parameters of the Call Instruction
...4> [#uses=1]
call void @p_ptr(i64 %stack_abc1) nounwind, !dbg !33
Q.2 stack_abc1 is a alias for the operation performed by the
ptrtoint instruction.
Which fields from the instruction class will help me read if I may say
the "output" of the instruction ?
Thanks
Shankha Banerjee
2010 Jul 03
1
[LLVMdev] generating src code along with LLVM assembly from byte code
Hi,
Are there any options that can be used with llvm-dis to generate LLVM
assembly along with source code if the original byte code had been
built with
-g. e.g. objdump -D -d -S -l executable gives you the source code
listing along with the assembly.
--
Thanks
Shankha
2010 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Figuring out the parameters of the Call Instruction
Hi Shankha,
> 24 p_ptr ((unsigned long)&abc);
> call void @p_ptr(i64 ptrtoint (%struct.my_struct* @abc to i64))
> nounwind, !dbg !31
>
> Q.1 At line no 24 I try to read the address of global variable abc.
> The address is type casted
> from struct * to int * fo...
2010 Jul 15
1
[LLVMdev] Figuring out the parameters of the Call Instruction
...ruct* @abc to
i64)) nounwind, !dbg !52
I think by the call CI->getArgOperand(0) you mean CI->getOperand(0).
That doesn't return the ptrtoint constant expression. The CI instruction
has shows two operands. The first operand is the function name. The
second operand
prints NULL.
thank you,
Shankha Banerjee