search for: shandelman

Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day. But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy. Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output as without that flag. I cannot tell you how many times I sit and scratch my head long and hard,after I discover that my intended rsync operations did not actually happen. Until I finally

raf via rsync wrote: > T. Shandelman via rsync wrote: > > > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day. > > > > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy. > > > > Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output > > as witho...

T. Shandelman via rsync wrote: > Rsync is a remarkably handy tool that I use virtually every day. > > But there is one thing about rsync that drives me totally crazy. > > Under the -n (dry run) flag, rsync seems to produce exactly the same output > as without that flag. > > I cannot t...

...using an rsync 3.0.0 client, you # might see the s flag combined with t instead of the proper T flag for this # time-setting failure) I was not able to make rsync to really ignore times (no # reporting this). ? Luis A. Florit Feb 21 '19 at 20:08 # >> Thank you! Todd Shandelman Austin, Texas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20200322/3595ac98/attachment.htm>