search for: shadow_flag

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "shadow_flag".

Did you mean: shadowflag
2006 Sep 29
0
RE: [PATCH] support HVM guests with more than 3.75G memory
Hi Steven, I still saw this bug when booting a win2003 server with 5G memory on changeset 11655. (XEN) sh error: sh_remove_shadows(): can''t find all shadows of mfn 1f2cdf (shadow_flags=00000100) (XEN) domain_crash called from common.c:2197 (XEN) Domain 4 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#2: (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0-unstable x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- (XEN) CPU: 2 (XEN) RIP: 0008:[<0000000080867bd5>] (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000010246 CONTEXT: hvm (XEN) rax: 00000000ee604801...
2006 Oct 08
0
RE: [PATCH] add RDMSR/WRMSR instruction emulationtoVMXAssist decoder
...now. > >Tim. > >At 13:07 +0800 on 30 Sep (1159621646), Li, Xin B wrote: >> After applying this patch, while booting a 2 vCPUs PAE SMP >Windows 2003 server in VMX, I got: >> >> (XEN) sh error: sh_remove_shadows(): can''t find all shadows >of mfn 23ecf7 (shadow_flags=80000008) >> (XEN) domain_crash called from common.c:2197 >> (XEN) Domain 1 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3: >> (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0-unstable x86_64 debug=n Not tainted ]---- >> (XEN) CPU: 3 >> (XEN) RIP: 0008:[<000000008086bf9b>] >> (XEN) RFLAGS: 000000...
2007 Dec 05
13
[PATCH] unshadow the page table page which are used as data page
The patch deals with the situation which guest OS uses unused page table pages as data pages and write data to them. The pages will still be grabbed by Xen as page table pages, and lots of unnecessary page faults occur. The patch will check if the data guest writes to the page table contains valid mfn or not, if not, we believe it is a data page now and then unshadow the page. The patch
2009 Jan 26
24
page ref/type count overflows
With pretty trivial user mode programs being able to crash the kernel due to the ref counter widths in Xen being more narrow than in Linux, I started an attempt to put together a kernel side fix. While addressing the plain hypercalls is pretty strait forward, dealing with multicalls (both when using them for lazy mmu mode batching and when explicitly using them in e.g. netback - the backends are
2013 Sep 23
57
[PATCH RFC v13 00/20] Introduce PVH domU support
This patch series is a reworking of a series developed by Mukesh Rathor at Oracle. The entirety of the design and development was done by him; I have only reworked, reorganized, and simplified things in a way that I think makes more sense. The vast majority of the credit for this effort therefore goes to him. This version is labelled v13 because it is based on his most recent series, v11.