search for: shadow_copy2

Hi, I make use of shadow_copy2 and root preexec. The vfs root preexec is responsible to auto create home directories which initially don't exist. The script behind it is well tested and works perfectly. Unfortunaltely shadow_copy2 seems to be called before root preexec and fails due to the missing ZFS home share which ca...

...it's doing something as it say 'working' for a short amount of time. Also if I crank up vfs debugging to 10 I get: [2020/10/05 16:50:03.879093, 10, pid=50572, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/smbd/vfs.c:65(vfs_find_backend_entry) vfs_find_backend_entry called for shadow_copy2 Successfully loaded vfs module [shadow_copy2] with the new modules system ... [2020/10/05 16:50:12.483055, 10, pid=50572, effective(3000037, 20), real(0, 0), class=vfs] ../../source3/modules/vfs_default.c:1327(vfswrap_fsctl) FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: 0 volumes for path[Program Files]. The sh...

On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:10 +0100, Leander Schäfer via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I make use of shadow_copy2 and root preexec. The vfs root preexec is  > responsible to auto create home directories which initially don't > exist.  > The script behind it is well tested and works perfectly. > Unfortunaltely  > shadow_copy2 seems to be called before root preexec and fails due to > the  &...

Hi, Can anyone reassure that files & folders made available to windows via vfs shadow_copy2 cannot be modified in any way? My NAS backups are stored on an iscsi target formatted with ext4 & I'm concerned that they could be tampered with by a virus such as Cryptolocker. Thanks

Hello I'm having a problem using the virusfilter and shadow_copy2 modules which, unless I'm mistaken, seems like a conflict between these modules. If I use the virusfilter, acl_xattr, recycle, shadow_copy2 and full_audit modules together, everything works perfectly, if I use the NOTHING, RENAME or DELETE actions of the virusfilter module. If I choose to use t...

Hello, since oure shadow_copy2 is running now. I have another question: Is it possible to uses the shadow-copy on a linux-client? We mount the share via cifs from the Samba-fileserver. Stefan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size:...

We have: vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl (Actually, vfs objects = shadow_copy2 zfsacl fruit streams_xattr, but I wanted to point out the order of shadow_copy2 and zfsacl). To rule out shadow:format problems, I would create just one snapshot with a simple name and configure shadow:format accordingly. Also, is /public the mountpo...

Hello, I did setup shadow_copy2 with BTRFS snapshots. While this works fine for directories Windows does not show any previous versions for files. I couldn?t find anything regarding this, only one other using complaining about this in the OMV forums. Is this expected behaviour? Regards, Alexander

Hi Alexander, On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:19:59 +0200, Alexander Harm || ApfelQ via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I did setup shadow_copy2 with BTRFS snapshots. While this works fine for directories Windows does not show any previous versions for files. I couldn?t find anything regarding this, only one other using complaining about this in the OMV forums. Is this expected behaviour? Assuming you're talking about the Windows Explo...

...mb.conf :- [global] server role = active directory domain controller domain logons = yes ... [Pluto] path = /srv/share/Pluto # Expose incremental backups to staff, so they can do their own # restores via the Windows GUI (similar to Apple Time Machine). vfs objects = shadow_copy2 shadow:snapdir = .snapshots # it looks like the Samba 4.0.x version of shadow_copy2 ignores shadow:basedir # and looks for snapshots in $mount_point/shadow:snapdir (where $mount_point # is dynamically determined by samba based on path for this share). shadow:basedir = /srv/share s...

...hares, there have been reports that adding 'vfs objects' to > [global] causes problems. > Rowland Dear Rowland This host is a Samba 4.6.2 domain member server. In the Global session of smb.conf, I have this line: Vfs objects = acl_xattr On Sharing: Vfs objects = recycle, shadow_copy2, full_audit I disabled vfs objects in the global session, but the error still persists.

Hi there I'm having some troubles with Shadow Copy2 & zfs Snapshots. I have hourly and daily snapshots. If I use the following settings it works (but omits daily snapshots): vfs objects = shadow_copy2 shadow:snapdir = .zfs/snapshot shadow:sort = desc shadow:localtime = yes shadow:format = easysnap-hourly_%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-UTC However when I try to use the BRE with the prefix, so that daily and hourly snapshots would be included, it won't work (no previous old versions being shown in...

Summary: what software are you using to generate (non-zfs) snapshots for use with vfs shadow_copy2? I've recently deployed a file server to a new site and one of my pet projects has been enabling Windows Previous Versions functionality. I had originally intended to use Snapper to generate and manage lvm thin snapshots, however it seems it's build scripts are broken on rhel8/centos8 s...

...9;s definitions (I have 3 shares that all resided on /home partition': 'ServHome' (home of user on the server) 'home' (share of the root of the share) and '/homes' (the per-user in Domain share) where their profiles go Each has: vfs objects = recycle readahead shadow_copy2 recycle: keeptree=true shadow:snapdir = /home/snapdir shadow:basedir = /home 01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 Yet when I go look at files that that have been modified on the 6th, I see no previous versions. In /var/log/samba/c...

...are stored inside this basedir in the folder .btrfs root at SRVUBUNTU:/btrfs/samba/.btrfs# ls -l total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 12 Aug 24 13:15 @GMT-2012.08.24-15.15.25 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16 Aug 24 13:07 @GMT-2012.08.24-15.26.40 This is my smb.conf ------------------- [data] vfs objects = shadow_copy2 shadow:snapdir = /btrfs/samba/.btrfs shadow:basedir = /btrfs/samba read only = no path = /btrfs/samba/ browsable = yes guest ok = yes follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes unix extensions = no ------------------------------------ I can't see the snapshots in &q...

...ath = disable spoolss = Yes load printers = No printcap name = /dev/null printing = bsd wins support = No dns proxy = No name resolve order = host disable netbios = No inherit acls = Yes inherit owner = Yes inherit permissions = Yes [Adm] path = /srv/samba/adm read only = No vfs objects = shadow_copy2 shadow:basedir = /srv/samba/adm shadow:snapdir = /srv/snapshots/adm shadow:sort = desc I'm using shadow_copy2, but I found an issue when a user opened a file in the history and could change this file. The file is not readonly. Which IMHO is critical, snapshots should be immutable. T...

Am 18.12.24 um 19:42 schrieb Ralph Boehme: > On 12/18/24 7:16 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> I would say that's fine :-) > > hm... can you > > kania$ cd /glusterfs/admin-share/daten1/ > > ? Yes :-) skania at cluster01:~$ cd /glusterfs/admin-share/daten1/ skania at cluster01:/glusterfs/admin-share/daten1$ ls -l insgesamt 1 -rwxrwx---+ 1 skania domain users

Hello, we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned volume to use gluster-snapshots. Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and everything was working fine. Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we got the following message: root at ng-data1:~# smbclient -m SMB3 //ctdb/gluster -k smb: \> ls NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND listing \* On a windows-system we got the message "Element...

Hello I'm having a problem using the virusfilter and shadow_copy2 modules which, unless I'm mistaken, seems like a conflict between these modules. If I use the virusfilter, acl_xattr, recycle, shadow_copy2 and full_audit modules together, everything works perfectly, if I use the NOTHING, RENAME or DELETE actions of the virusfilter module. If I choose to use t...

On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 13:36 +0000, Ricardo Pardim Claus via samba wrote: > Gentlemen,  > > Can anyone tell me if the modules below are working normally in versions later than 4.4.5? > > Shadow Copy service What problems were you facing with shadow_copy2 module in later versions? >   > full_audit > I'm in version 4.4.5. However, when I had to use these modules, they presented several problems. > So I was warned that these modules would be rewritten.  > Anyone know if these modules have been updated?  > Thank you! >