Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "shadow_64".
2006 May 05
6
PAE mode mismatch in Xen (xen=no Dom0=yes)
Hi,
I just added 32GB memory in my system and wanted Xen to see that memory, so enabled PAE in xen0 and XenU. I did a make menuconfig in xen0 and xenU, then did a make in xen-unstable and a make install.
Whilebooting this kernel, I get the above error PAE mode mismatch. I looked under xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h has #define X86_CR4_PAE defined and so does cpufeature.h have this defined.
2005 Sep 01
0
[PATCH][VT]Make 32-bit VMX guest work on 64-bit host
...| 2
xen/arch/x86/shadow.c | 516
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
xen/arch/x86/shadow_public.c | 93 +++++-
xen/arch/x86/vmx.c | 22 +
xen/include/asm-x86/page-guest32.h | 5
xen/include/asm-x86/shadow.h | 39 +-
xen/include/asm-x86/shadow_64.h | 143 ++-------
xen/include/asm-x86/shadow_public.h | 1
10 files changed, 720 insertions(+), 249 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Chengyuan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2006 Feb 18
4
[PATCH] HVM x86_32 PAE guest support on 64-bit Xen
...+++++++++++++--
xen/arch/x86/shadow.c | 258
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
xen/arch/x86/shadow_public.c | 32 ++++
xen/common/page_alloc.c | 1
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/hvm.h | 10 +
xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 8 +
xen/include/asm-x86/shadow_64.h | 78 ++++++++++-
9 files changed, 457 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2006 Jul 14
23
[RFC] New shadow paging code
We (Michael Fetterman, George Dunlap and I) have been working over the
last while on a full replacement for Xen''s shadow pagetable support.
This mail contains some design notes, below; a patch against
xen-unstable, giving a snapshot of the current state of the new shadow
code, is at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch
Comments on both are welcome, although the code is not