search for: shadow2

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "shadow2".

Did you mean: shadow
2006 Jul 14
23
[RFC] New shadow paging code
...rge Dunlap and I) have been working over the last while on a full replacement for Xen''s shadow pagetable support. This mail contains some design notes, below; a patch against xen-unstable, giving a snapshot of the current state of the new shadow code, is at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch Comments on both are welcome, although the code is not finished -- in particular there are both some optimizations and some tidying-up that need to be done. Cheers, Tim. ---- The new shadow code (dubbed ''shadow2''), is designed as a replacement for the current shadow cod...
2007 Mar 13
7
vram_dirty vs. shadow paging dirty tracking
...little odd that we''re doing a memcmp to determine which portions of the VRAM has changed. Couldn''t we just use dirty page tracking in the shadow paging code? That should significantly lower the overhead of this plus I believe the infrastructure is already mostly there in the shadow2 code. Is this a sane idea? Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2009 Jan 26
24
page ref/type count overflows
With pretty trivial user mode programs being able to crash the kernel due to the ref counter widths in Xen being more narrow than in Linux, I started an attempt to put together a kernel side fix. While addressing the plain hypercalls is pretty strait forward, dealing with multicalls (both when using them for lazy mmu mode batching and when explicitly using them in e.g. netback - the backends are
2006 Aug 31
7
Core 2 Duo
Am considering a new laptop, and I wonder if anyone here can share their Xen experiences with the newest Core 2 Duo CPUs, ref http://www.intel.com/products/processor/core2duo/specifications.htm The list at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors doesn''t include any Core 2 Duos. Does that mean that people have had problems, or is the wiki just not up to date? I gather
2019 Apr 06
2
selftest, help with a single test
...ork Disk vfs_fruit_delete_empty_adfiles Disk badname-tmp Disk manglenames_share Disk dynamic_share Disk widelinks_share Disk fsrvp_share Disk fake shapshots using rsync shadow1 Disk previous versions snapshots under mount point shadow2 Disk previous versions snapshots outside mount point shadow3 Disk previous versions with subvolume snapshots, snapshots under base dir shadow4 Disk previous versions with subvolume snapshots, snapshots outside mount point shadow5 Disk previous...
2019 Apr 01
5
selftest
Thanks for the reply, Besides the problem with source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c, Good to hear that selftest is actively used, then do I understand it right that 'make test' should succeed? My bigger problem is that it failed with lots of errors. This must be a problem with my build, then, but since this is a fresh tarball I am a bit puzzled. I would appreciate some hint on