search for: sgx

Is anyone working on SCSI passthrough using the ''SCSI Generic'' support under Linux, eg /dev/sgX? This is how VMWare allows a VM to use SCSI devices. Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...dq,-fma4,+prfchw,+bmi2,+xsavec,+fsgsbase,+popcnt,+aes,+xsaves,-avx512er,-avx512vpopcntdq,-clwb,-avx512f,-clzero,-pku,+mmx,-lwp,-xop,+rdseed,-sse4a,-avx512bw,+clflushopt,+xsave,-avx512vl,-avx512cd,+avx,-rtm,+fma,+bmi,+rdrnd,-mwaitx,+sse4.1,+sse4.2,+avx2,+sse,+lzcnt,+pclmul,-prefetchwt1,+f16c,+ssse3,+sgx,+cmov,-avx512vbmi,+movbe,+xsaveopt,-sha,+adx,-avx512pf,+sse3 It successfully creates a binary, but the binary when run crashes with: Unhandled exception at 0x00007FF7C9913BA7 in test.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF. The disassembly of the crashed instructio...

...G8 and the vm's xml: https://dpaste.com/984JX4LUQ if I build the image with the default flags (march=x86-64), the vm boots well. my new chost is -O2 -pipe -march=skylake -mabm -mno-adx -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-bmi -mno-bmi2 -mno-f16c -mno-fma -mno-xsave -mno-xsavec -mno-xsaveopt -mno-xsaves -mno-sgx the cpu is Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz thoughts? Thanks, Dagg.

...,+fsgsbase,+popcnt,+aes, > +xsaves,-avx512er,-avx512vpopcntdq,-clwb,-avx512f,-clzero,-pku,+mmx,- > lwp,-xop,+rdseed,-sse4a,-avx512bw,+clflushopt,+xsave,- > avx512vl,-avx512cd,+avx,-rtm,+fma,+bmi,+rdrnd,-mwaitx,+sse4. > 1,+sse4.2,+avx2,+sse,+lzcnt,+pclmul,-prefetchwt1,+f16c,+ > ssse3,+sgx,+cmov,-avx512vbmi,+movbe,+xsaveopt,-sha,+adx,-avx512pf,+sse3 > > > It successfully creates a binary, but the binary when run crashes with: > > Unhandled exception at 0x00007FF7C9913BA7 in test.exe: 0xC0000005: Access > violation reading location 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF. > > The d...

...support. In a few months time, a new hand held created by a open source community is going to be released. More specificity Pandora: http://openpandora.org/ Its going to run with the following specs: * ARM? Cortex?-A8 600Mhz+ CPU running Linux * 430-MHz TMS320C64x+? DSP Core * PowerVR SGX OpenGL 2.0 ES compliant 3D hardware * 800x480 4.3" 16.7 million colours touchscreen LCD * Wifi 802.11b/g, Bluetooth & High Speed USB 2.0 Host * Dual SDHC card slots & SVideo TV output * Dual Analogue and Digital gaming controls * 43 button QWERTY and numeric keypad...

Dear R-List members, I want to check if a set of measurements follows better a gamma or a lognormal distribution (see data below). Using shapiro.test I can test for normality (shapiro.test(log (Lt)). To test for gamma (and normal) distribution I would use ks.test but I need to specify its shape and scale. How should I calculate these values in R? I tried > Lt.fit <- glm(Lt ~ 1,

...lieve this mitigation will be most useful in situations where code is handling extremely sensitive secrets that must not leak, and where a hit to performance is tolerable in service of that overriding goal. As we've mentioned, the original target of this mitigation was the threat of LVI against SGX enclaves instrumenting critically important secrets. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200310/b6f557e5/attachment.html>

...saves,-avx512er,-avx512vpopcntdq,-clwb,-avx512f,-clzero,-p >>> ku,+mmx,-lwp,-xop,+rdseed,-sse4a,-avx512bw,+clflushopt,+xsav >>> e,-avx512vl,-avx512cd,+avx,-rtm,+fma,+bmi,+rdrnd,-mwaitx,+ >>> sse4.1,+sse4.2,+avx2,+sse,+lzcnt,+pclmul,-prefetchwt1,+ >>> f16c,+ssse3,+sgx,+cmov,-avx512vbmi,+movbe,+xsaveopt,- >>> sha,+adx,-avx512pf,+sse3 >>> >>> >>> It successfully creates a binary, but the binary when run crashes with: >>> >>> Unhandled exception at 0x00007FF7C9913BA7 in test.exe: 0xC0000005: >>> Access...

...he vm's xml: https://dpaste.com/984JX4LUQ >if I build the image with the default flags (march=x86-64), the vm boots well. >my new chost is -O2 -pipe -march=skylake -mabm -mno-adx -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-bmi -mno-bmi2 -mno-f16c -mno-fma -mno-xsave -mno-xsavec -mno-xsaveopt -mno-xsaves -mno-sgx >the cpu is Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz > Not sure, but there might be some flags that are not passed through even with host-passthrough. Virtualisation ones are definitely one of those that need to be enabled on top of host-passthrough. The easiest thing to check that I can th...

More googling, and then something I wouldn't have thought of: smartctl doesn't work on this HBA against /dev/sd*. HOWEVER, it's happy as a clam against /dev/sgx, and there's my RAID, /dev/sg0 and /dev/sg1 (which lshw also was able to show me), but now, at least, I can run smartctl tests on the drives, and hopefully one will say, "Bad! Bad!". mark

Hello everyone, I wanted to run Dovecot inside Gramine [1]. Gramine is a tool to let normal Linux binaries run with the help of the Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX) technology [2] in a secure enclave to which the operating system doesn't have an access to. Most parts of Dovecot now run fine, however, Dovecot uses the SCM_RIGHTS flag for the sendmsg system call to exchange file descriptors over Unix sockets [3]. Normally, this feature is available in e...

Hi, I am working as a system administrator at an internet platform service provider, and I am currently seeking to re-new our Xen virtualization infrastructure for which I am mostly responsible for. Currently, we run Xen 3.4.2/3.4.3 on RHEL/CentOS 5.x (5.7) as Dom0 with CentOS 5.x pv-guests. Based on my experiments, I am currently looking into Xen 4.1.2 on RHEL/CentOS 6.x (6.2), with a

...seful in situations where code >> is handling extremely sensitive secrets that must not leak, and where a hit >> to performance is tolerable in service of that overriding goal. As we've >> mentioned, the original target of this mitigation was the threat of LVI >> against SGX enclaves instrumenting critically important secrets. >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200320/070af5ee/attachment.html>

...gt;>>> is handling extremely sensitive secrets that must not leak, and where a hit >>>> to performance is tolerable in service of that overriding goal. As we've >>>> mentioned, the original target of this mitigation was the threat of LVI >>>> against SGX enclaves instrumenting critically important secrets. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > ----------...

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > i was just writing this: > http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ > > when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would > greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. > > put these together: >

...de; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h index 83e22fd4cfc0..83667087d6e5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h @@ -905,9 +905,8 @@ static inline void REGISTER_WRITE8(struct drm_device *dev, #define PSB_RSGX32(_offs) \ ({ \ if (inl(dev_priv->apm_base + PSB_APM_STS) & 0x3) { \ - printk(KERN_ERR \ - "access sgx when it's off!! (READ) %s, %d\n", \ - __FILE__, __LINE__); \ + pr_err("access sgx when it's off!! (READ) %s, %d\n", \ +...

...argument) checking /dev/sgs... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgt... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgu... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgv... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgw... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgx... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgy... failed to open (Invalid argument) checking /dev/sgz... failed to open (Invalid argument) # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter. searchi...

i was just writing this: http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/60228-replicating-the-success-of-the-openpandora-discussion-v20/ when something that just occurred to me, half way through, and i would greatly appreciate some help evaluating whether it's feasible. put these together: http://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/epp/zynq-7000/index.htm

...attached to specified guest # domain by one of the following identifier format. # - XX:XX:XX:XX (4-tuples with decimal notation which shows # "host:channel:target:lun") # - /dev/sdxx or sdx # - /dev/stxx or stx # - /dev/sgxx or sgx # - result of ''scsi_id -gu -s''. # ex. # scsi_id -gu -s /block/sdb # 36000b5d0006a0000006a0257004c0000 # # VDEV gives virtual SCSI device by 4-tuples (XX:XX:XX:XX) as # which the specified guest domain recognize. # #vscsi =...

...Compliance- SpeedDis-, Selectable De-emphasis: -6dB Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance-ComplianceSOS- Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data Product Name: SGX-SAS6-INT-Z, Sun StorageTek 6Gb/s SAS PCIe HBA, Internal Read-only fields: [PN] Part number: 375-3640-02 [EC] Engineering changes: 01 [MN] Manufacture ID: 53 75 6e 20 4d 69 63 72 6f 73 79 73 74 65 6d 73 2c 20 49 6e 63 2e [SN] Serial number: SP1...