search for: sg_page

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

...b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c index a9caf1bc3c3e..282565ab5e3f 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c @@ -329,11 +329,11 @@ static void vhost_scsi_release_cmd(struct se_cmd *se_cmd) if (tv_cmd->tvc_sgl_count) { for (i = 0; i < tv_cmd->tvc_sgl_count; i++) - put_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_sgl[i])); + put_user_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_sgl[i])); } if (tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl_count) { for (i = 0; i < tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl_count; i++) - put_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl[i])); + put_user_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl[i...

...1bc3c3e..282565ab5e3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > @@ -329,11 +329,11 @@ static void vhost_scsi_release_cmd(struct se_cmd *se_cmd) > > if (tv_cmd->tvc_sgl_count) { > for (i = 0; i < tv_cmd->tvc_sgl_count; i++) > - put_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_sgl[i])); > + put_user_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_sgl[i])); > } > if (tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl_count) { > for (i = 0; i < tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl_count; i++) > - put_page(sg_page(&tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl[i])); > + put_user_page(sg_page(...

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's FS/block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the FS/block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi

...43% | 771670 Before achieving the function of Virtio-Net, we also have to let virtio core support these features: 1. virtio core support premapped 2. virtio core support reset per-queue 3. introduce DMA APIs to virtio core Please review. Thanks. v8: 1. vring_sg_address: check by sg_page(sg) not dma_address. Because 0 is a valid dma address 2. remove unused code from vring_map_one_sg() v7: 1. virtqueue_dma_dev() return NULL when virtio is without DMA API. v6: 1. change the size of the flags to u32. v5: 1. fix for error handler 2. add flags to record internal dma mapping v4...

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi detect

...ring_virtqueue *vq, struct scatterlist *sg, + enum dma_data_direction direction, static dma_addr_t *addr) { if (!vq->use_dma_api) { /* @@ -366,7 +365,8 @@ static dma_addr_t vring_map_one_sg(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq, * depending on the direction. */ kmsan_handle_dma(sg_page(sg), sg->offset, sg->length, direction); - return (dma_addr_t)sg_phys(sg); + *addr = (dma_addr_t)sg_phys(sg); + return 0; } /* @@ -374,9 +374,14 @@ static dma_addr_t vring_map_one_sg(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq, * the way it expects (we don't guarantee that the scatterlis...

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

As said before, please don't try to do weird runtime checks based on the scatterlist. What you have works for now, but there are plans to repalce the page + offset tuple in the scatterlist with just a phys_addr_t. And with that your "clever" scheme will break instantly.

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

...>DataBuffer.Offset = sgl[0].offset; - for (i = 0; i < scsi_sg_count(scmnd); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) { DPRINT_DBG(STORVSC_DRV, "sgl[%d] len %d offset %d\n", i, sgl[i].length, sgl[i].offset); - request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = - page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); + request->DataBuffer.PfnArray[i] = + page_to_pfn(sg_page((&sgl[i]))); } } else if (scsi_sglist(scmnd)) { /* ASSERT(scsi_bufflen(scmnd) <= PAGE_SIZE); */ -- 1.6.0.2

...if (dma) { > + s.max += sg_dma_len(s.sgp); > s.dma = sg_dma_address(s.sgp); > - else > + } else { > + s.max += s.sgp->length; > s.pfn = page_to_pfn(sg_page(s.sgp)); > + } > } > > return s;

Dear list, This is the V4 of the trim support for xen-blkfront/blkback, Now we move BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, and dropped all "trim" stuffs in the patches, and use "discard" instead. Also we updated the helpers of blkif_x86_{32|64}_request or we will meet problems using a non-native protocol. And this patch has been tested with both SSD and raw file, with SSD we will

...oes 1->2 and 2->1. If it went to zero, the pgmap->ref reference count would be incorrect if the allocation size was greater than one page. I see pci_alloc_p2pmem() is called by nvme_alloc_sq_cmds() and pci_p2pmem_alloc_sgl() to create a command queue and a struct scatterlist *. Looks like sg_page(sg) returns the ZONE_DEVICE struct page of the scatterlist. There are a huge number of places sg_page() is called so it is hard to tell whether or not get_page()/put_page() is ever called on MEMORY_DEVICE_PCI_P2PDMA pages. pci_p2pmem_virt_to_bus() will return the physical address and I guess pfn_to...

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size