search for: sg_magic

This introduces vringh, which are generic accessors for virtio rings (host side). There's a host-side implementation in vhost, but it assumes that the rings are in userspace, and is tied to the vhost implementation. I have patches to adapt it to use vringh, but I'm pushing this in the next merge window for Sjur, who has CAIF patches which need it. This also includes a test program in

This introduces vringh, which are generic accessors for virtio rings (host side). There's a host-side implementation in vhost, but it assumes that the rings are in userspace, and is tied to the vhost implementation. I have patches to adapt it to use vringh, but I'm pushing this in the next merge window for Sjur, who has CAIF patches which need it. This also includes a test program in

Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This patch attempts to abstract the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> ---

Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). This patch attempts to abstract the business of dealing with the virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> ---

OK, so I've spent a few days benchmarking. Turns out 80% of virtio_add_buf cases are uni-directional (including the always-performance-sensitive networking code), and that gets no performance penalty (though tests with real networking would be appreciated!). I'm not reposting all the "convert driver to virtio_add_outbuf()" patches: just the scsi one which I didn't have

OK, so I've spent a few days benchmarking. Turns out 80% of virtio_add_buf cases are uni-directional (including the always-performance-sensitive networking code), and that gets no performance penalty (though tests with real networking would be appreciated!). I'm not reposting all the "convert driver to virtio_add_outbuf()" patches: just the scsi one which I didn't have

Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device. virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific step in the device driver, and generic

Most device drivers do not need to perform any postprocessing on the scatterlists they receive from higher-level drivers (e.g. the block or SCSI layer), because they translate the request metadata directly from the various C structs into the data that is required by the device. virtio devices however do this translation in two steps: a device-specific step in the device driver, and generic

Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf, which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally delete virtqueue_add_buf(). I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next. Thanks! Rusty. Paolo

Add virtqueue_add_sgs which is more general than virtqueue_add_buf, which makes virtio-scsi and virtio-blk nicer, then add virtqueue_add_inbuf and virtqueue_add_outbuf which handle the more general case, and finally delete virtqueue_add_buf(). I'm hoping this will be the final post of the whole series, and it can move from my pending-rebases tree into virtio-next. Thanks! Rusty. Paolo

The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations: 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call; 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be provided as an array of struct scatterlist. Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into a scatterlist internal to the driver. It cannot just use the one that was prepared by the

The virtqueue_add_buf function has two limitations: 1) it requires the caller to provide all the buffers in a single call; 2) it does not support chained scatterlists: the buffers must be provided as an array of struct scatterlist. Because of these limitations, virtio-scsi has to copy each request into a scatterlist internal to the driver. It cannot just use the one that was prepared by the

OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure about. Thanks, Rusty. Paolo Bonzini (3): scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path Rusty Russell (13): virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs. virtio-blk:

OK, this is (ab)uses some of Paolo's patches. The first 7 are candidates for this merge window (maybe), the rest I'm not so sure about. Thanks, Rusty. Paolo Bonzini (3): scatterlist: introduce sg_unmark_end virtio-blk: reorganize virtblk_add_req virtio-blk: use virtqueue_add_sgs on req path Rusty Russell (13): virtio_ring: virtqueue_add_sgs, to add multiple sgs. virtio-blk: