search for: sfqs

Hi i need a cbq configuration that works and drops packets if the flow exceeds an amount of data.. Do u have any configuration that drops packets...? My cbq configuraion doesnt drop packets... The traffic use the correct class but seems that tha cbq is not able to control correct the flow __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

...a year ago, and back then it was working well, and I even installed a linux router for someone and there it is still working. BUT now I have checked the speed of my webserver, and when eMule is running it is only at 4 kb/s instead of 32 kb/s. AND I have found the reason for this: If I remove the SFQs, scheduling seems to work - at least at the "bad precision" of HTB: Apache receives over 20 kb/s and eMule is limited to 12 kb/s instead of 8. Now what exactly is the reason for this? I thought it was absolutely normal to have these SFQ queues? Removing them is no solution because HTB...

If in one time 3 IP adresses using internet. TC script: DEV=eth0 # LAN SERVER_IP=192.168.1.2 # eth0 ip address tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 255 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 384Kbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 384Kbit prio 0 quantum 1500 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 128Kbit

=== tc filter - based on iptables - MAC fw marking not working == DEV="eth1" tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbps ceil 3276800kbit tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:15 htb rate 3kbps prio 4 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 500kbps prio 3 tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:15 handle

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hi all, I''ve got a BOX running CentOS 4.5. It acts as a firewall + router. I have installed both iptables and iproute2. I has 3 network cards. eth0 is connected to Internet (is has an internet ip. pls assume its ip is 1.2.3.4/29). it is a 256 Kbit link. eth1 is DMZ. its ip is 192.168.100.254 eth2 is LAN. Its ip is 192.168.101.254 I have alreday shaped traffic to 64 Kbit on eth1 for

Hi, After reading section 9 of LARTC it seemed to me that a pure TOS based QoS setup with be sufficient for a small newtork. Interactive packets could have the highest priority, second highest for DNS and small HTTP packets and lowest prio for all others. The advantage is that, the setup would be simply a couple of iptables lines, because the default pfifo_fast qdisc already implements

Dear all, I''m having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I''m also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving later this month (I work in a university). In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down, 64kbit up, never to be allowed more bandwidth than this. It is also important that the latency remains

I run a small Linux webserver and NAT router from my cable modem at home. Whenever someone starts an http download, all other traffic from my LAN is starved. Bandwidth is not really an issue, but latency is particularly horrible -- pings that usually come back in 20ms can take up to 600ms while the web server is active! I set up QoS (netfilter+iproute2) on the NAT machine in an attempt to give

I''m trying to shape traffic on a Devil-Linux box. This note was originally sent to their maillist, because the LARTC list appears to have been down for the past few days. My mailbox was just flooded with a half dozen or so confirmation requests in response to my repeated attempts to subscribe to this list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: drew einhorn

Hello, I run one of my PCs as my personal router, with iptables+tc to control traffic and be my firewall. In TC, I use a combination of htb, qdisc and sfq (as well as prio) to classify bandwidth. In my current setup, I have 10 classifications of my bandwidth. (Even I admit this is probably more than I need, but at this point I''m still learning, so I''ll just leave them be.)