Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "sfantao".
Did you mean:
antao
2014 Oct 01
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Samuel F Antao <sfantao at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Alexey, Alexander,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I tried removing the flag SA_NODEFER but it
> didn't do any good... I have been digging into the problem with the
> null_deref test today but I was unable to clearly identify the problem. I
> suspec...
2014 Jul 31
2
[LLVMdev] FPOpFusion = Fast and Multiply-and-add combines
...gt; Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, Olivier H
> Sallenave/Watson/IBM at IBMUS
> Date: 07/31/2014 09:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] FPOpFusion = Fast and Multiply-and-add combines
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On 30 July 2014 22:37, Samuel F Antao <sfantao at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > In the DAGCombiner, during the combination of mul and add/subtract into
> > multiply-and-add/subtract, this option is expected to be Fast in order
to
> > enable the combine. This means, that by default no multiply-and-add
opcodes
> > are going to...
2014 Sep 05
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
...ving the flag from
compiler-rt/trunk/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_posix_libcdep.cc and
see if that makes any difference.
HTH,
Alex
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote:
> +Bill Schmidt
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Samuel F Antao <sfantao at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been experiencing the failure of the address sanitizer regression
>> tests for a PPC64 target (Power7 machine). My understanding is that most of
>> the failures are related with the fact the stack is not being d...
2014 Sep 24
2
[LLVMdev] noalias and alias.scope metadata producers
Hal, Johannes,
Thanks for the feedback. I have been digging into this a little bit more
and was able to have some of this metadata being generated. Nevertheless, I
am confused about the semantics of this metadata. Let me explain:
I was expecting the alias metadata to complement the information that alias
analysis passes compute. However, it seems that the alias information of
the pointers used
2014 Aug 07
2
[LLVMdev] FPOpFusion = Fast and Multiply-and-add combines
...ail/llvmdev/2013-December/068868.html
>
> I don't see an answer as to whether this is a bug for all the other
> compilers, a deficiency in clang's default settings, or just an
> implementation choice.
>
> Sanjay
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Samuel F Antao <sfantao at us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thanks for the thorough explanation. It makes perfect sense.
>
> I was not aware fast-math is supposed to prevent more precision
> being used than what is in the standard.
>
> I came across this issue while looking into the output or di...
2014 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
Hi all,
I have been experiencing the failure of the address sanitizer regression
tests for a PPC64 target (Power7 machine). My understanding is that most of
the failures are related with the fact the stack is not being dumped.
I tried to understand what might be wrong and started by looking into the
null_deref.cc test as it hangs during the test run. I observe that after
the detection of the
2014 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] FPOpFusion = Fast and Multiply-and-add combines
Hi all,
The AllowFPOpFusion option passed to a target can currently take 3
different values, Fast, Standard or Strict (TargetOptions.h), being
Standard the default.
In the DAGCombiner, during the combination of mul and add/subtract into
multiply-and-add/subtract, this option is expected to be Fast in order to
enable the combine. This means, that by default no multiply-and-add opcodes
are going
2014 Nov 05
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform
It seems the crash of llvm/clang build on aarch64 Debian has been fixed by
r220941.
Thanks,
-Jiangning
2014-11-05 8:45 GMT+08:00 Jiangning Liu <liujiangning1 at gmail.com>:
> The versions I'm using right now are
>
> * gcc: (Debian/Linaro 4.9.1-14) 4.9.1
> * libstdc++: libstdc++.so.6.0.20
>
> Thanks,
> -Jiangning
>
> 2014-11-05 4:46 GMT+08:00 Chris Bieneman
2014 Nov 04
4
[LLVMdev] Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform
Hi all,
I observe that r220932 (Removing the static initializer in
ManagedStatic.cpp by using llvm_call_once to initialize the ManagedStatic
mutex.) is causing tablegen to segfault in PPC platforms during static
initialization. The crash happens while calling std::call_once introduced
by this patch in the wrapper used in getManagedStaticMutex.
I understand this call is buggy for some platforms
2014 Sep 26
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Address sanitizer regression test failures for PPC64 targets
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 22:00 -0400, Samuel F Antao wrote:
> Alexey, Alexander,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I tried removing the flag SA_NODEFER but
> it didn't do any good... I have been digging into the problem with the
> null_deref test today but I was unable to clearly identify the
> problem. I suspect that it was either a bug with the calling
> convention/unwinding
2014 Sep 19
3
[LLVMdev] noalias and alias.scope metadata producers
Hi all,
In LLVM language reference I read that one can use noalias and alias.scope
metadata to provide more detailed information about pointer aliasing.
However, I was unable to obtain any LLVM IR annotations using this metadata
from any LLVM optimization pass or Clang frontend (am I missing
something?).
If I understand it correctly, this information would complement the
type-based alias
2015 Jun 23
2
[LLVMdev] SafeStack pass and TLS support
Hi all,
Shouldn't SafeStack pass be executed only if the target has TLS support?
E.g. currently for NVPTX there is no way to implement
`__safestack_unsafe_stack_ptr`.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Samuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150623/53f40bea/attachment.html>
2014 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform
Hi Bill,
You can find the same issue in the buildbot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/16444/steps/compile.llvm.stage2/logs/stdio
It is failing for me both in BE (gcc 4.8.2) and LE(4.9.1). I am compiling
with clang 3.5, but those are the gcc toolchains I am using.
What do you think is the best way to fix this?
Thanks!
Samuel
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at
2015 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] [Openmp-dev] [RFC] OpenMP offload infrastructure (iteration 2)
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for putting the new version of the document together! I don't see
any other issues. I strongly believe the approach described in the document
is a nice way to get OpenMP offloading support in clang. I plan to start
actively contributing code for this component of the OpenMP implementation
soon.
Thanks again,
Samuel
2015-04-29 11:47 GMT-04:00 Sergey Ostanevich
2014 Nov 04
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with std::call_once in PPC64 platform
Ok, I'll put a patch together to fix this later today. I'll probably do
what Reid was suggesting and use what is already in there for Windows.
Thanks,
Samuel
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 11/04/2014 12:11:08 PM:
> From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: Samuel F Antao/Watson/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: azanella at