Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "sextortrunc".
Did you mean:
zextortrunc
2009 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] cygwin build patch
On Jan 20, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Jay Foad wrote:
>>> I realise that the DataTypes.h.in part might be controversial. Also,
>>> there's probably a better place to put it, but I'm not sure where.
>>
>> I didn't apply this part. What problems does it cause to not have
>> this? Can we fix uses of max and min?
>
> I could try to fix this by changing
2009 Jan 20
4
[LLVMdev] cygwin build patch
>> I realise that the DataTypes.h.in part might be controversial. Also,
>> there's probably a better place to put it, but I'm not sure where.
>
> I didn't apply this part. What problems does it cause to not have
> this? Can we fix uses of max and min?
I get these errors in lib:
.../lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp:162: error: no matching function
for call to