Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "setup_new_block_fp".
Did you mean:
set_new_block_fp
2011 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
...changed to point to this new location (so that the FP
relative indexing works). %rbp will then be set to its "correct" value
by the epilogue itself. We'll probably need a new routine
(set_new_block_fp) for this situation.
**** Stack space for setup_new_block
setup_new_block and setup_new_block_fp will be written to use the
minimum amount of stack space possible, and that stack space will have
to be factored into the check in the function prologue (so every
function prologue checks for the space it needs _plus_ the space
required to run setup_new_block once, by a callee).
*** cleanup_new_bl...
2011 Mar 23
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:37:02PM +0530, Sanjoy Das wrote:
> I intend to start with the simplest possible approach - representing the
> stack as a doubly linked list of _block_s, the size of each _block_
> being a power of two. This can later be modified to improve performance
> and accommodate other factors. Blocks will be chained together into a
> doubly linked list structure
2011 Mar 23
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: GSoC Project
Hi All!
I will be applying to the LLVM project for this GSoC, and I wanted some
preliminary sanity check on my project idea.
I intend to implement split (segmented) stacks for LLVM (like we have in
Go, and as being implemented for GCC [1]). A lot of what follows is
lifted from [1]; I will progressively add more details as I get more
familiar with the LLVM codebase.
I intend to start with