search for: setup_files

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the

Without this option, configure will fail when there is no display. Signed-off-by: Masami HIRATA <msmhrt at gmail.com> --- configure.ac | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index de8a064..61d6f69 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -593,16 +593,16 @@ working. AC_MSG_FAILURE([$QEMU version must be >=

I am rebasing Fedora rawhide oprofile package to oprofile-0.9.7. The xenoprof patches on http://xenoprof.sourceforge.net/#download look a bit dated. The newest version is for oprofile-0.9.5. I massaged the patch oprofile-0.9.5-xen.patch to apply to oprofile-.0.9.7. Attached is that updated patch. Does this look reasonable? Is there a desire to get this into upstream oprofile? Or should the

Another test, the same as before.

Best of .. 4?

After enabling procmail debugging ...

This is a repost so I can test my procmail script / automatic testing framework. The patch series is identical to v1. Rich.

Patch 1 cleans up the gobject tests. Patches 2 and 3 remote gtk-doc, which is slow and useless, and replace it with a simple manual page. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465665 Rich.

On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Hi to all, > Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba > packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports > (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors with > the "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names". > > If I install Bind9 in version

Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:

Hopefully this time ...

Hello - make fails to build the latest git of samba4 - erroring on drsblobs.so. Below is a full log from autogen.sh to the make. Would you have any suggestions on proceeding? Thank you, Ryan ryan at test1:~/samba-master/source4$ sudo ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: running script/mkversion.sh ./script/mkversion.sh: 'version.h' created for Samba("4.0.0alpha12-GIT-d83850a")