search for: setup2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I'm currently trying to get ACLs to work with my Samba-PDC. I compiled Samba with the "--with-acl-support"-option and the configure-script says: checking sys/acl.h usability... yes checking sys/acl.h presence... yes checking for sys/acl.h... yes After install, a "ldd smbd" gives libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1

...commands we were using were working fine. First, we load our data using arrayname<-read.table("filename", header=T) and then check that the table is OK. We format the data list using setup1<-init.data() and usually get a series of questions to answer about the array design, using setup2<- init.grid() and then normalize it. Now when we type in setup1<-init.data() we get: "error: couldn't find function!" HELP!!?? Please reply to true at wi.mit.edu if you have any ideas or answers. Thanks, Heather Heather L. True-Krob, Ph.D Whitehead Institute 9 Cambridge Center...

Hi I have brought everything together in this email. The problem ======== Take the following DAG (arrow to predecessor): SetUp2 SetUp1 ^ ^ | | | | Destroy2---->PredSU <----SU ^ ^ ^ | | | | | | ----------- | --------- | | | Destroy1...

sorry, Just noticed that the diagrams have 'Destroy' & 'SetUp' the wrong way around! Robert ________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Robert Lytton [robert at xmos.com] Sent: 21 August 2013 18:34 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses() causing failure in

Hi, I have reasoned through and believe the problem is with the PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses. Take the following DAG (arrow to predecessor): Destroy Destroy ^ ^ | | | | SetUp----->PredSU <-----SU ^ ^ ^ | | | | | | ----------- |

...---eth0.1000 | | __eth1.1001 ----------------------------------------------------eth1.1001 When I enable spanning tree on both bridges (brctl stp br0 on). They both stay sending BPDU packages and no port is disabled. So I get a loop. For some reason spanning tree is not working. Setup2: --------- When I repeat the following test without the VLANs the spanning tree protocol is working: br0 br1 | | -- eth0 --------------------------...

I have built a version of the current 1.2.2 patched version of R using Inno Setup2 (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.htm). (That toolkit is open source (in Delphi) and was fairly easy to tame. Full details are in the R-patched sources.) This gives a single ~10Mb file, at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/RWin/SetupR.exe The idea is that it should look very like a Windows 2000-...

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some