search for: settypeaction

...an an MVT. Are there any general objections to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass Regards, Patrik Hägglund -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists....

...ot;Unsupported extended type!"); return Legal; } unsigned I = VT.getSimpleVT(); assert(I<4*array_lengthof(ValueTypeActions)*sizeof(ValueTypeActions[0])) ; return (LegalizeAction)((ValueTypeActions[I>>4] >> ((2*I) & 31)) & 3); } void setTypeAction(MVT VT, LegalizeAction Action) { unsigned I = VT.getSimpleVT(); assert(I<4*array_lengthof(ValueTypeActions)*sizeof(ValueTypeActions[0])) ; ValueTypeActions[I>>4] |= Action << ((I*2) & 31); } I am not really sure what is going on here, but would be happy...

...p | 2 +- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.h | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) commit 267ded9a2357edbee4947b91e4abc54ef6d185e6 Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> Date: Tue Dec 4 11:11:43 2012 +0100 Change TargetLowering::setTypeAction to take an MVT, instead fo EVT. include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h | 4 ++-- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) commit 968d4fc892e13c7a4b37f3e083a91fbf457be746 Author: Patrik Hägglund <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com&gt...

...ny general objections to replace EVT with MVT in these cases? > > For example, a quick look at TargetLowering.h give me this list of (member) functions, taking an EVT parameter, that asserts if the argument is not an MVT: > > getRegClassFor, getRepRegClassFor, getRepRegClassCostFor, setTypeAction, getLoadExtAction, isLoadExtLegal, getTruncStoreAction, isTruncStoreLegal, getIndexedLoadAction, getIndexedStoreAction, getCondCodeAction, getTypeToPromoteTo, addRegisterClass > Please do. MVT is cheaper than EVT and conceptually cleaner when dealing with physical machine types. EVT should...

...y processor does not have physical 64-bist registers. To achieve this I made ConnexTargetMachine::computeDataLayout() return string "e-m:e-p:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64-n32:32-S128". I also gave at the end of ConnexTargetLowering::ConnexTargetLowering() the following: ValueTypeActions.setTypeAction(MVT::i16, TypeLegal); to avoid errors like: Promote integer operand: t16: ch = store<ST256[inttoptr (i16 250 to <128 x i16>*)]> t13:1, t13, Constant:i16<250>, undef:i16 But even now it gives errors like: ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: t16: ch = sto...

Hello. I wanted to inform that I fixed the bug from the previous email. The main reason for the bug was that I thought that the SDNode masked_gather is returning only 1 value, but it returns 2 (hence, I guess, the earlier reported, difficult to follow, error: "Assertion `New->getNumTypes() == 1"). masked_gather returns 2 values because: // SDTypeProfile -