search for: setto

...uot;ivan2" <sip:ivan2@192.168.0.2;transport=udp> res_search: NO result ! res_search: NO result ! SipClient: Sending to '192.168.0.3:5060' SipCallMember: localStatusUpdated: 200 CallAudio: Using GSM for output CallAudio: Sending to remote site 192.168.0.3:19696 UDPMessageSocket::SetTOS: Operation not permitted CallAudio: OSS device already open (readwrite) anyone can help me ?? thanks Ivan

Hi, I have a testing multihome setup, with the default gateway being one of the links and using policy routing to honor requests for a specific link. Everything works as expected when I request a specific IP to bind to. But if I request a specific interface things fall apart in ways that I can not explain: default gw (WORKS) ---------- rabbit@Thesaurus:~$ ping -c 1 yahoo.com PING yahoo.com

...8.0.2;transport=udp> > > >res_search: NO result ! >res_search: NO result ! >SipClient: Sending to '192.168.0.3:5060' >SipCallMember: localStatusUpdated: 200 >CallAudio: Using GSM for output >CallAudio: Sending to remote site 192.168.0.3:19696 >UDPMessageSocket::SetTOS: Operation not permitted >CallAudio: OSS device already open (readwrite) > > >anyone can help me ?? > > >thanks > > >Ivan > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >...

...t; > readthese, and the settings were just ignored. > > Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > > settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? > > That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to be > > setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. > > Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you feel > > itwould be helpful. > > Andrew Bartlett > > > Hi folks, > I've tried to get password policies setting using the Windows GPMC > from RSAT working. U...

...these, and the settings were just ignored. >>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? >>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to be >>> setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. >>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you feel >>> itwould be helpful. >>> Andrew Bartlett >>> >> Hi folks, >> I've tried to get password policies setting using the Windows GPMC >&g...

...ngs were just ignored. > >>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? > >>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to > >>> be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. > >>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you feel > >>> itwould be helpful. > >>> Andrew Bartlett > >>> > >> Hi folks, > >> I've tried to get password policies setting...

...t ignored. >>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the GPO? >>>>> That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" needs to >>>>> be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. >>>>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you feel >>>>> itwould be helpful. >>>>> Andrew Bartlett >>>>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> I've tried to get passwor...

Winbindd can see the NT-user, but samba can't work with the NT-user. My System: SuSE Linux 7.2 Enterprise Server Samba-2.2.3a I have install samba by the following steps: 1. ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.3a --with-winbind 2. make 3. make install 4. cp /tmp/samba-2.2.3a/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /lib 5. ln -s /lib/libnss_winbind.so /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 6. vi

...>>>> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the > >>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" > >>>>> needs to be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. > >>>>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you > >>>>> feel itwould be helpful. > >>>>> Andrew Bartlett > >>>>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>>...

...gt;> Now it can, but given there are now existing domains, which >>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the >>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" >>>>>>> needs to be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. >>>>>>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you >>>>>>> feel itwould be helpful. >>>>>>> Andrew Bartlett >>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi folks, >&g...

On 27.08.2023 23:45, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 11:49 +0200, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I just wonder why it is not possible to set domain password policies >> with GPO, using the Windows RSAT Group Policy Manager? For most >> other >> settings, using GPOs through RSAT works. >> >> For somebody who sets

...can, but given there are now existing domains, which > >>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the > >>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" > >>>>>>> needs to be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. > >>>>>>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you > >>>>>>> feel itwould be helpful. > >>>>>>> Andrew Bartlett > >>>>>>> > >>>>...

...given there are now existing domains, which >>>>>>>>> settingshould be primary, the one in the DB or the one in the >>>>>>>>> GPO? That is why the smb.conf setting "apply group policies" >>>>>>>>> needs to be setto Yes if the GPO approach is to be taken. >>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask for a wiki account to point out this if you >>>>>>>>> feel itwould be helpful. >>>>>>>>> Andrew Bartlett >>>>>>>>> >>&...

Hi all. I have 2 ip phones (Grandstream Budgetone): -budgetone1 -budgetone2 All two are connected to an Asterisk server. When I make a call from budgetone1 to budgetone2, I can speak with budgetone2 whith no problem. But when budgetone2 hangs up, budgetone1 does not play any tone (like busy tone). Budgetone1 seems to be still in conversation, but what conversation! Has anyone had a problem