search for: setting_up_a_basic_smb

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:32:22 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Carlos, > > I suggest start here : > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File > > Which says.. > > # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts > # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: > # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! > # - must use an read-write-enabled...

Hello I have a Debian 8 with samba (Version 4.2.10-Debian) that serves as Fileserver. My smb.conf [global] workgroup = XXXXX realm = GRUPO.XXXXX.COM.BR security = ADS idmap config * : backend = rid idmap config * : range = 100000-999999 client schannel = no allow trusted domains = yes winbind use default domain = yes

Hello everyone. I thought I had everything configured correctly but it seems not. I've got two servers. One is the AD DC and another that has been joined to the domain. This is the output I get first from the AD DC when I do a getent: root at dc1:/etc# getent group 'Domain Admins' AD\domain admins:x:3000004: root at dc1:/etc# getent passwd 'stephen'

Thanks for your reply Rowland. > The id ranges are what you choose, reading this may help: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File > > >/Is there any working way of controlling those ranges, />/given idmap breaks stuff? / > What do you mean 'idmap breaks things' ? > Sorry, should have made it clearer that my SAMBA is configured as AD Primary Domain Controller; According to https://wiki.sam...

...nny via samba escreveu: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:32:22 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hai Carlos, >> >> I suggest start here : >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domai >> n_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File >> >> Which says.. >> >> # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts >> # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: >> # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! >> # - mus...

...land Penny via samba escreveu: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:32:22 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hai Carlos, >> >> I suggest start here : >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File >> >> Which says.. >> >> # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts >> # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: >> # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! >> # - mus...

...n move them to the range where they belong, 1000 upwards. I asked what docs you have been following, you never said, but I think it is the outdated ones, try reading here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page and here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File Rowland

I am in the process of moving our single Samba 3.x servers to a new 4.x AD server setup, with member servers. I have the Main ADC installed and running perfectly, machines can join with no problems. Seriously, it couldn't honestly be any easier, thanks for the Samba4 Wiki. It saved me a ton of time and stress. I'm working next on getting several test member servers working as well, and

Hai, ? The wiki http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba/Domain_Member ? is missing something like this tekst.? when you follow the wiki, from this point ? wbinfo -p Ping to winbindd succeeded wbinfo -u administrator dns-rtd-dc2 dns-rtd-dc1 krbtgt guest getent passwd output = only linux users ? you need to set nis (rfc2307) (uid/gid) on the users and groups in the AD, then when done, this works

Hai Carlos, I suggest start here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File Which says.. # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use an read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. idmap...

...'s different "I believe" is not my problem. As I mentioned the problem only occurs with access via sharing .... Regards Em 27-06-2017 11:32, L.P.H. van Belle via samba escreveu: Hai Carlos, I suggest start here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File Which says.. # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use an read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap...

Greetings everyone, I am currently in the process of trying to setup Samba4 as an Active Directory DC. My environment contains about 50% of Windows workstations, and 50% of Centos servers/Ubuntu workstations. Everything setup quite nicely, with Windows workstations and Linux machines being able to logon with a domain user. The problem I have is I can't seem to be able to get consistent UIDs

On 22/10/2019 16:01, Stephen Atkins wrote: > On 22/10/2019 8:48 a.m., Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> Have you read this: >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File > > > I have and I thought I set it up correctly.? I followed the > idmap_config_ad link to setup my domain member.? But I'm going over it > again as I'm sure I missed something. > >>> >>> Let me know if you would like to see any other config...

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:08:32 +0000 Stephen Parry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks for your reply Rowland. > > > The id ranges are what you choose, reading this may help: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File > > > > >/Is there any working way of controlling those ranges, />/given > > >idmap breaks stuff? / > > What do you mean 'idmap breaks things' ? > > > Sorry, should have made it clearer that my SAMBA is configured as AD > Primary Domai...

I have questions regarding the operation of AD and integrating NIS or LDAP with it. I have a small heterogenous network consisting of various computing devices running either Windows 10 pro or a flavour of Linux. I am setting up a NAS box running Debian Stretch and Samba 4.5.12 to be the central file server and authenticator for the network, including LDAP aware software such as owncloud. I have

...e" is not my problem. > As I mentioned the problem only occurs with access via sharing .... > Regards > > Em 27-06-2017 11:32, L.P.H. van Belle via samba escreveu: > > > Hai Carlos, I suggest start here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member#Setting_up_a_Basic_smb.conf_File Which says.. # Default ID mapping configuration for local BUILTIN accounts # and groups on a domain member. The default (*) domain: # - must not overlap with any domain ID mapping configuration! # - must use an read-write-enabled back end, such as tdb. idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap...

Just when I thought I had idmap changes correct for 3.6, I realize I have a setup that's not quite right: getent passwd ->No AD users getent passwd DOMAINA\\aduser aduser:*:1001601:1000513::/home/aduser:/bin/bash Shouldn't "getent passwd" show both local and AD users? Samba has had such an identity crisis over the years with idmap documentation. Depending, on where you

I checked my entire setup again and again. Now I can see the my share. The most relevant change I did (afaik - ofcourse): - since I am using ad backend I created dedicated unix admin groups (as recommended in the docs) - I removed the $ from the share section/defnition ([projects$] -> [projects]) - I changed browseable switch from 'no' to 'yes' Iam still getting the "event

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:33 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:57:21 +0000 > Harpoon via samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've been reading and it seems like ad backend has many features that > > I'd like to use. However, despite browsing many

Hi Tom, Small update. I'am also still looking into this but im not getting much futher.. I am just reading : https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2009/12/31/verifying-the-server-signature-in-kerberos-privilege-account-certificate/ Bit older but, im trying to understand more what happens here. And the only "guess" i can make here is . A kerberos ticket, with