search for: setting_share_permissions_and_acl

On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:46:04 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb <bd730c5053df9efb at proton.me> wrote: > > Hi Rowland! > > Thank you for your reply but wouldn't operations like the one > described in > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > fail if the uid of the user that is performing said operations does > not map to uid = 0? > No, but you have to set Domain Admins as the group on the shares directory, give Domain Admins the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege privilege and you should be able to set/change permissions from Windows...

...ndows 10. >> Rowland For now, I have a computer park running Windows 7, and it's also a Windows 7 machine that I use to access various RSAT tools. For share management, I follow the procedure outlined on this page : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs But I encounter the same issue when browsing the network from a test machine (connected to the domain) and right-clicking on the netlogon share, for example. Philippe. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/sa...

...onse! > > We have made progress, and are hung up on some odd behaviour > (at least > to us) with the computer management and shares/security tab. > > To be more explicit, looking at the wiki page > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Wind > ows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > > The odd behaviour seems to us that in the "Share Permissions" > tab,? the > group "Everyone" must have Read access in order for the > "Security" tab > to be able to show/adjust security access. > > Is this expected behaviour?? It runs...

>Did you miss: >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs   No, this part of the wiki made me realize I have a problem. It talks about changes via the security tab. I don't have that tab. That is the whole problem. I gather from your previous answer setfacl needs to be used to sort that out. But I miss that part in the wiki. So either something is...

Hi Rowland, >> Hi all, >> >>   >> I followed the installation instructions >> on https://imanudin.net/2014/11/16/how-to-install-samba4-active-directory-on-centos-7-part-1/#comment-16611 >> to install Samba 4.1.13. One difference is that I used the Internal >> DNS server as opposed to the external one.  >I suppose you totally missed the fact that the

...7 machine that I use to access various RSAT tools. Windows 7 is EOL and I have checked, the share MMC has been removed from Windows 10. > For share > management, I follow the procedure outlined on this page : > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > > But I encounter the same issue when browsing the network from a test > machine (connected to the domain) and right-clicking on the netlogon > share, for example. That should work, can you please post the output of 'samba-tool testparm' when run on the Samba AD DC. Rowlan...

...ou recommendations. Here is a more accurate view of things: To reiterate we have a new Windows Server 2019 AD for authentication and new samba 4.11.6-Ubuntu member server for file sharing (\\proto1) Looking at the wiki page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs It appears that in the "Share Permissions" tab,? the group "Everyone" must have Read access in order for the "Security" tab to be able to show/adjust security access. After removing the share permissions group Everyone (changing it to something more secure) we are?...

Hi, Brand new VM's running on ESXi replacing existing Samba 3 NT domain. I am not quite brand new but this is my first time for this combination. Would like to use Win Ad for authentication and Samba for 20 users and company shared data. Started with this how-to: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member Lost my way on Choose backend for id mapping in winbindd

...s. Just for the record, the howto you used doesn't mention that >   > Ha, you are now referencing to the page I just mentioned. It does not > mention setting ACLs, which should be added I suppose. Did you miss: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs Can I suggest upgrading to the latest Samba version 4.5.5 and following the Samba wiki, not some random webpage, that way, you are sure to get the full and correct info. If there is something on the Samba wiki you do not understand, ask here. Rowland

...t 2024 18:46:04 +0000 > bd730c5053df9efb bd730c5053df9efb at proton.me wrote: > > > Hi Rowland! > > > > Thank you for your reply but wouldn't operations like the one > > described in > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > > fail if the uid of the user that is performing said operations does > > not map to uid = 0? > > > No, but you have to set Domain Admins as the group on the shares > directory, give Domain Admins the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege privilege and > you should be able to set/...

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:10:59 +1000 Henry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Great idea. Under FAQ in detail with a link to FAQ item on the > Windows ACLs page under adding a share: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs#Adding_a_Share > Want me to draft something? > That would be a good idea, that way you get ownership, post the

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:44:42 +0000 Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm preparing a migration from a NT4-mode domain controller 3.5 to > version 4.19. The migration process is going well, but from the share > management MMC, no matter the share defined in the smb.conf, when I > try to access the authorization tab, I

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 17:36:34 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I was following a recent thread here and read Rowland Penny's answer > (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2024-October/249858.html) > stating > > [...]I have stopped using 'username map' & 'min domain uid' because, > has you have

...once Samba 4.X is in production. In the meantime, I need to perform a migration to an equivalent level of functionality and version. > For share > management, I follow the procedure outlined on this page : > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs > #Setting_Share_Permissions_and_ACLs > > But I encounter the same issue when browsing the network from a test > machine (connected to the domain) and right-clicking on the netlogon > share, for example. >> That should work, can you please post the output of 'samba-tool testparm' when run on the Samba AD DC....