search for: setregmaskoperand

...ss. >> >> Add a method "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when >> you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which >> "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >> >> Ok. > Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? -Vivek > -Vivek > >> -- >> Mehdi >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llv...

...egMask in various other class. > > Add a method "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. > > Ok. > > Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? > -Vivek I expect your code to be the only user of such a function so I would not add it to MachineInstr but keep the code local in your pass for now (you can add a static helper function in the .cpp...

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > > On May 27, 2016, at 11:49 AM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello Mentors, > > > > I have completed writing simple register mask calculator pass, an > immutable pass that stores RegMasks and provides API to query them, and a >

...ethod "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when >>> you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which >>> "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >>> >>> Ok. >> > > Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through > operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? > -Vivek > > > I expect your code to be the only user of such a function so I would not > add it to MachineInstr but keep the code local in your pass for now (you > can add a static...

...class. >>> >>> Add a method "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >> >> Ok. > > Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? With this behavior I'd expect the method to be named updateRegMask... Also, what is the semantic if there is no regmask? -- Mehdi > -Vivek > > >> -Vivek >>> -- >>...

...class. >> >> Add a method "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >> >> Ok. >> >> Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? >> -Vivek > > I expect your code to be the only user of such a function so I would not add it to MachineInstr but keep the code local in your pass for now (you can add a static helper functio...

...; Add a method "setOperandMask()" in class MachineOperand, and then when you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >>>> >>>> Ok. >>> >>> Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? >>> -Vivek >> >> I expect your code to be the only user of such a function so I would not add it to MachineInstr but keep the code local in your pass for now (you can add a static he...

..." in class MachineOperand, and then when >>>> you find a call you just walk all the operands till you find one which >>>> "isRegMask()" at which point you can update it. >>>> >>>> Ok. >>> >> >> Is it ok to add "setRegMaskOperand()" in class MI and looping through >> operands to find RegMask is also included in method ? >> -Vivek >> >> >> I expect your code to be the only user of such a function so I would not >> add it to MachineInstr but keep the code local in your pass for now (y...