search for: setfunctionattributes

...th,"\$ORIGIN/../lib" && : lib/ExecutionEngine/CMakeFiles/LLVMExecutionEngine.dir/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp.o: In function `LLVMCreateMCJITCompilerForModule': /home/rengolin/devel/llvm/src/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp:188: undefined reference to `llvm::setFunctionAttributes(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Module&, bool)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status This is my CMake command line: cmake -G Ninja $LLVM_SRC -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_BUILD_TESTS=False -DLLVM_INCLUDE_EXAMPLES=False -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIO...

...return 1; legacy::PassManager passmanager; TargetLibraryInfoImpl TLII(moduletriple); TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); passmanager.add(tliwp); module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filetype != obj"; { raw_pwrite_stream *outstream = &objoutstrea...

...ryInfoImpl TLII(moduletriple); >> >> TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); >> >> passmanager.add(tliwp); >> >> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >> >> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >> >> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >> errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filetype != obj"; >> >> { &...

...; > > TargetLibraryInfoImpl TLII(moduletriple); > > TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); > > passmanager.add(tliwp); > > module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); > > setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); > > if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && > FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) > errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filetype != obj"; > > { > raw_pwrite_s...

...;> TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); >>>> >>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>> >>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>> >>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>> >>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>> errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filetype != obj"...

...gt;>> >>> TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); >>> >>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>> >>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>> >>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>> >>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>> errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filetype != obj"; >>>...

...new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); >>>>>> >>>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>> >>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>> >>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>> >>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>> errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-a...

...nfoWrapperPass *tliwp = new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TLII); >>>>> >>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>> >>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>> >>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>> >>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>> errs() << "warning: ignoring -mc-relax-all because filet...

...>>>>>> >>>>>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>>>> errs() << &qu...

Updated patch is attached. Note this is just a work-in-progress patch and I plan to address the feedback comments later if this patch is in the right direction. This is how the command line options are parsed and used by the backend passes: 1. Tools such as clang and llc call cl::ParseCommandLineOptions. Any of the options that should be written to the bitcode as function or module attributes

...pperPass(TLII); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>>> errs() << "warning: igno...

...> >>>>>>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>>>>> err...

...t;>>>>>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>>>>>...

...t;>>> passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>>>>...

...passmanager.add(tliwp); >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> module->setDataLayout(tmachine->createDataLayout()); >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> setFunctionAttributes(cpuname, ftrlist, *module); >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> if (RelaxAll.getNumOccurrences() > 0 && >>>>>>>>>>>> FileType != TargetMachine::CGFT_ObjectFile) >>>...

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > So my general concern here is that lots of command line options that don't > need to be or shouldn't be IR level constructs become oddly named string > options. It's bad enough that we're doing that with the target cpu and > target feature string let alone the rest of it. > >

> On Nov 19, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed Nov 19 2014 at 4:39:42 PM Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com <mailto:ahatanak at gmail.com>> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com <mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> wrote: > So my general concern here is

Thanks for your feedback, Eric. I still think we may be talking past each other a little bit, but rather than delving further into the details right now, I’ve suggested to Akira that he look into how we should handle other kinds of options. I’m hoping that as we look at more of them, we will gain some insight into the approach that we want to take here. This patch really only deals with the easy

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 4:22:15 PM Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for your feedback, Eric. >> >> I still think we may be talking past each other a little bit, but rather >> than >> > > Might be, sorry if so :( > > >> delving

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 4:31:43 PM Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon Dec 01 2014 at 4:22:15 PM Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com>