search for: setfd

...t; ) dns_servers=( "192.168.10.a 192.168.10.b 192.168.10.c" ) dns_servers_eth0=( "192.168.10.a 192.168.10.b 192.168.10.c" ) dns_servers_eth1=( "192.168.10.a 192.168.10.b 192.168.10.c" ) config_eth0=("null") bridge_xenbr0=("eth0") brctl_xenbr0=("setfd 0" "sethello 0" "stp off") config_xenbr0=( "192.168.10.d netmask 255.255.255.0" ) routes_xenbr0=( "default via 192.168.10.e" ) depend_xenbr0() { need net.eth0 } config_eth1=( "null" ) brctl_xenbr1=("setfd 0" "sethello 0&q...

...w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0" + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0" + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0" + ! sysctl -w "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0" brctl addbr ${bridge} brctl stp ${bridge} off brctl setfd ${bridge} 0 -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...l, I'm trying to bridge the wlan0 and eth0 on an embedded system. I used the following commands to setup the bridge: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous ifconfig wlan0 0.0.0.0 promiscuous brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 brctl sethello br0 1 brctl setmaxage br0 4 brctl setfd br0 4 ifconfig br0 up The eth0 is connected to a local network, and wlan0 is set to Ad-hoc mode with proper SSID. After the bridge is stablized, I use dhclient to assign an IP for br0. Then I use a laptop to connect to the bridge. I could ping the bridge (br0), however I could not access the local...

...bridge doesn''t come up. The normal behaviour should be that the Xenbr0 bridge comes up automatically, but it doesn''t anymore. Here''s my network configuration file (/etc/conf.d/net): config_eth0=( "null" ) bridge_xenbr0="eth0" brctl_xenbr0=( "setfd 0" "stp off" ) config_xenbr0=( "dhcp" ) I don''t understand why, the bridge doesn''t come up. This is the output of the ifconfig command: lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 S...

Hi. I have a Shuttle box with an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ and 1GB of RAM. I''m normally running it with Debian sarge/sid and kernel 2.6.10-1-k7, as built by Debian. I want to use Xen on it. I built a xen0 kernel which is as close to the Debian kernel as I can (no power management, no HPET timers, broken ISA drivers disabled), disabled /lib/tls, and booted with the new kernel. Everything works.

...ndependent of the node they are running on. How to do the following while running Tinc in switch mode, on Node A: ip link set dev eth0 up ip addr add 192.168.200.30/24 dev eth0 ip route add default via 192.168.200.1 dev eth0 # Gateway connected to the internet brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 ip link set dev br0 up ip addr add 10.20.0.1/16 dev br0 # using same IP on node as node B so the LXC containers can use same gateway IP iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE ip route add 10.20.0.0/16 dev br0 sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 on Node B: ip link se...

...them no IP address but a unique MAC. On the other end of each tap device is an UML virtual machine's eth0. My machines are SuperMicro 6013 dual xeon boxes with e1000, and a 5012 box with e100 NICs. I don't believe this is a checksum issue raised a while back. STP is off. Settings for setfd and sethello make no difference. As soon as UML brings up its eth0 interface, the messages appear. I'm really not a kernel hacker, but I was able to look at previous versions of the file and more or less just comment out the "if (unlikely(fdb->is_local))" statement. This is wha...

...If so, what am I doing wrong? Linux 2.4.20, root user. I set up tap interfaces like this: >tunctl tap4 >ifconfig tap4 4.4.4.4 promisc up >tunctl tap5 >ifconfig tap5 5.5.5.5 promisc up I then set up the bridge and add the tap interfaces to it: >brctl addbr tapbr >brctl setfd tapbr 0 >brctl sethello tapbr 0 >brctl stp tapbr off >ifconfig tapbr 7.7.7.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 up >brctl addif tapbr tap4 >brctl addif tapbr tap5 I then do a ping over tap4: >ping -I tap4 8.8.8.8 and tcpdump on tap5: >tcpdump -i tap5 and see nothing. Shouldn'...

Hi! I have a problem with my new Xen setup. I have installed Debian etch with netinstall and I''m using 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 kernel in my dom0 and 3.0.3-0-4 version xen hypervisor. I''m using four network cards on my system and using three of them as xen bridges and dom0 is using the fourth one only for it''s own. So basicly both of my virtual servers use a network card

...echo $? "Failed to set up interface ${i}" done ifconfig $b $(eval echo \$\{bridge_${b}_ip\}) brctl setbridgeprio ${b} 0 brctl sethello ${b} 1 brctl setmaxage ${b} 4 brctl setfd ${b} 4 brctl stp ${b} on done echo -e "$return" ;; [snip]the rest of the script isn't relevant[/snip] esac

...rtual network. This is the script I use to set up the bridge: brctl addbr br0 ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promisc up ifconfig tap0 0.0.0.0 promisc up ifconfig br0 abc.def.ghi.jkl netmask 255.255.255.0 up brctl stp br0 off #This is to ensure the bridge does not send spanning tree protocol packets. brctl setfd br0 1 brctl sethello br0 1 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 tap0 This worked fine. I then tried to set the two interfaces (eth0, tap0) in non-promiscuous mode. My expectation was that the bridge would not work anymore. Nevertheless, it kept working and my two networks were still bridged. Virtu...

Hi, The attached patch fixes the setup of the bridge ports and the bridge itself. Changes: * move some functions to xen-network-common.sh, so both vif-bridge and network-bridge can use them. * add a new function to configure bridge ports and use it. * make sure arp requests, ipv6 autoconfiguration and ipv6 router solicitations are disabled for the bridge ports and also for the

Hello, I am experiencing what may be a unique problem with operating the bridge. My hardware is custom Freescale MPC875 processor based with one ethernet (eth0) and one hdlc (hdlc0) WAN port and I am connecting two of these boards together using the WAN ports over a long distance - essentially two bridges in series. They are running Linux 2.6.15 with bridging enabled in the kernel

Hi, I was hoping someone on this forums could help me out with a problem I was facing with Xen. When I compiled the kernel for Xen-3.1.3 using "make world"(I know this is an old version but I need to use it for some compatibility issues), the kernel was missing the Xen netloop module. There was no /kernel/drivers/xen/netback/netloop.ko in the newly compiled kernel. I think we would

...'m having a hell of a time getting my IFB to work. I know I''ve done this before, so I''m missing something stupid. Can anybody tell me what it might be? Configs as follows: -------- #!/bin/sh modprobe ifb numifbs=1000 modprobe act_mirred modprobe 8021q brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl addif br0 eth2 ifconfig eth1 up ifconfig eth2 up ifconfig br0 up tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 ifconfig ifb0 up tc q...

Hi I intent to use brctl to bridge two devices on linux box. One is eth0, the other is USB net which is recognized as usb0 by linux box. Then I run following command # ifconfig eth0 down # ifconfig usb0 down # brctt addbr ipbr # brctl addif ipbr eth0 # brctl addif ipbr usb0 # ifconfig eth0 up # ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig usb0 up # ifconfig usb0 0.0.0.0 # ifconfig ipv6 up

...nnection and the Ethernet on my Linux-Notebook, was succesful. But using the same Host to Host connection on my Arm9 board shows the same problems like the USB Host to Device connection. My configuration of the bridge is like: ifconfig usb0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr brd brctl setfd brd 100 brctl addif eth0 brctl addif usb0 ifconfig brd 192.168.1.1 Anybody there who can help? Regards Sascha Dikhoff P.S.: For interested readers the link from the tool netio http://ftp.leo.org/historic/comp/os/os2/leo/systools/netio123.zip -- +++ GMX - Die erste Adresse f?r Mail, Message, M...

...PC2's arp entry). When PC3 get reply from PC2 and then the PC1 will also get reply immediately. Does any one know what's problem? The command for adjust forward dely : /usr/sbin/brctl setbridgeprio mybr 0 /usr/sbin/brctl sethello mybr 1 /usr/sbin/brctl setmaxage mybr 4 /usr/sbin/brctl setfd mybr 4 /usr/sbin/brctl stp mybr on Two bridge machines are install with linux-2.4.26 and use the ebtables patch (ebtables-brnf-6-vs-2.4.26). Network environment: PC1 --------- Bridge 1 -------- PC2 |----- Bridge 2 ---| PC3 ---- Very thank for your help Regards, Matt....

..., 11694 KByte/s (0%) Rx. Packet size 32k bytes: 111 KByte/s (99%) Tx, 11716 KByte/s (0%) Rx. Done. Here is what I tried: I set "tx off" on ALL interfaces with the ethtool command, changed tx-queue-length, disabled all iptables/ebtables, set bridging to "sethello 0" and "setfd 0" ... But nothing changes. I used the default Xen which comes with Redhat 5.2 and tried different Redhat-Kernels, also the latest from 5.3 Also I tried different Xen version. First 2-3 different versions which come with Redhat 5.2 and its updates. Then I tried version 3.3.0 and 3.3.1 from ano...

...55.255.0.0 pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth1 up pre-up /sbin/ifconfig bond0 up pre-up /sbin/ifenslave bond0 eth0 pre-up /sbin/ifenslave bond0 eth1 pre-up /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 pre-up /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 bond0 pre-up /usr/sbin/brctl stp br0 off pre-up /usr/sbin/brctl setfd br0 0 When the system boots, it has no connectivity at all. If I remove the bridge and set the IP on bond0, then connectivity is fine. Bridging also works if I configure it for eth0 alone. So, in summary, both components work fine independently, but as soon as I put a bridge on bond0, I lo...