search for: setexpandedinteg

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "setexpandedinteg".

Did you mean: setexpandedinteger
2018 Mar 13
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. Thanks, Sejong From: vsk at apple.com <vsk at apple.com> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at microsoft.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Jonas Devliegh...
2018 Mar 09
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...2 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn't find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case. I found this proble...
2018 Mar 09
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
+ Adrian, Joshua + Jonas, since he contributed the transferDbgValues change in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger > On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Se Jong Oh via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a problem that dbg_value nodes are not transferred when integer DAG nodes are promoted. For example, an i32 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by DAGTypeLegali...
2018 Mar 14
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. > > Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. > > Thanks, > Sejong > > > > From: vsk at apple.com <vsk at apple.com> > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM > To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at mic...
2018 Mar 14
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. Thanks, Sejong From: vsk at apple.com<mailto:vsk at apple.com> <vsk at apple.com<mailto:vsk at apple.com>> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at mi...
2018 Mar 15
1
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. > > Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. > > Thanks, > Sejong > > > > From: vsk at apple.com <vsk at apple.com> > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM > To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at mic...
2018 Apr 30
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. > > Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. > > Thanks, > Sejong > > > > From: vsk at apple.com <vsk at apple.com> > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM > To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at mic...
2018 Apr 30
2
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. >> >> Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. >> >> Thanks, >> Sejong >> >> >> >> From: vsk at apple.com <vsk at apple.com> >> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM &g...
2018 Apr 30
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...anks for help! I think that sign extension is not involved here. PromoteIntegerResult is called since i32 is not a legal type in my target and the legalizer promotes operations with i32 result type to i64 operations. I think that SetPromotedInteger seems to be a common place for all promotions like SetExpandedInteger. Jonas, I would appreciate it if you can guide me about whether my understanding is correct or not. Thanks, Sejong From: vsk at apple.com<mailto:vsk at apple.com> <vsk at apple.com<mailto:vsk at apple.com>> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:19 PM To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at mi...
2018 Mar 09
0
[SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred
...2 add node is promoted to a i64 add node by DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntegerResult and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn't find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case. I found this proble...