Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "setbyteord".
Did you mean:
setbyteorder
2011 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] New TargetSpec 'llvmnote'
On Feb 23, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>
>> On the other hand, if "Byte Order" makes sense to include, should
>> other parts of targetdata be included? Pointer size seems the next
>> most desirable -- endianness and pointer size would be sufficient for
>> many elf tools, for example. However, the other parts of
>> targetdata could
2011 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] New TargetSpec 'llvmnote'
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:43:35PM -0800, Dan Gohman wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > This leads to a number of problems in LLVM:
> > - we have a bunch of duplication
> > - we have confusion about what a triple is (normalized or not)
> > - no good way to tell if a triple is normalized
> > - no good, centralized way to reason about