Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "setbasicblock".
Did you mean:
getbasicblock
2006 Apr 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based JVM JIT for libgcj
...void setCurrentBlock(BasicBlock *);
Value *createAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, const std::string &Name = "");
Value *createSub(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, const std::string &Name = "");
...
};
Given this, use would be much more implicit:
InstructionCreator IC;
IC.setBasicBlock(FalseBB);
Value *A = IC.createAdd(LHS, RHS);
Value *B = IC.createSetEQ(A, RHS);
IC.createBr(B, TrueBB, FalseBB);
IC.setBasicBlock(TrueBB);
...
if so, I can add this. Do you have a suggestion for a name better than
"InstructionCreator"?
> I think libjit only has one technical idea t...
2006 Apr 18
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based JVM JIT for libgcj
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> writes:
>> FWIW I actually did this work twice, once for libjit and once for
>> LLVM. I'm happy to provide a comparison, from a jit-writing
>> perspective, if you're interested.
Chris> Given your experience with both, I'd be very interested in any
Chris> thoughts you have on