search for: set_file_info

Hi @all, Can someone please just confirm me, that Samba doesn't remove a directory in case of a "SET_FILE_INFO"-Request for this directory? The following abstract is out of an Ethereal-Log and shows a SET-FILE-INFO-Request for a directory: ############################################################################ No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info 1...

Hello mailinglist, I have a strange problem, which occurs sometimes on some WinXP clients. It is not 100% reproducable for me, but it returns regular. The problem is, that somehow a user can't delete a directory. All files in the directory will be removed successfully, but the directory itself not. Deleting with the Explorer or over the cmd-console returns in the same result. First the

...mmands Calls Min RTT Max RTT Avg RTT FIND_FIRST2 204 0.12546 0.54965 0.14905 QUERY_FS_INFO 93 0.12489 0.20448 0.13657 QUERY_PATH_INFO 425 0.12507 0.36258 0.13878 QUERY_FILE_INFO 2371 0.12427 0.88422 0.13971 SET_FILE_INFO 5 0.12780 0.13102 0.12943 GET_DFS_REFERRAL 1 0.12902 0.12902 0.12902 NT Transaction Commands Calls Min RTT Max RTT Avg RTT NT IOCTL 15 0.12761 0.21489 0.14543 NT NOTIFY 37 0.12815 216.02239 45.200...

...6.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Trans2 Request, QUERY_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1cf0, Query File Basic Info 33 1.006104 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96 SMB Trans2 Response, QUERY_FILE_INFO 34 1.006345 10.16.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Trans2 Request, SET_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1cf0 35 1.006589 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96 SMB Trans2 Response, SET_FILE_INFO 36 1.007075 10.16.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Read AndX Request, FID: 0x1cf0, 222 bytes at offset 0 37 1.007318 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96...

...YYY SMB Trans2 Request, QUERY_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1dc8, Query File Internal Info 1058 2.545126 192.168.0.YYY 192.168.0.XX SMB Trans2 Response, FID: 0x1dc8, QUERY_FILE_INFO 1059 2.545520 192.168.0.XX 192.168.0.YYY SMB Trans2 Request, SET_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1dc8 1060 2.545584 192.168.0.YYY 192.168.0.XX SMB Trans2 Response, FID: 0x1dc8, SET_FILE_INFO 1061 2.545914 192.168.0.XX 192.168.0.YYY SMB Close Request, FID: 0x1dc8 1062 2.545961 192.168.0.YYY 192.168.0.XX SMB...

...6.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Trans2 Request, QUERY_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1cf0, Query File Basic Info 33 1.006104 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96 SMB Trans2 Response, QUERY_FILE_INFO 34 1.006345 10.16.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Trans2 Request, SET_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x1cf0 35 1.006589 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96 SMB Trans2 Response, SET_FILE_INFO 36 1.007075 10.16.37.96 10.240.47.86 SMB Read AndX Request, FID: 0x1cf0, 222 bytes at offset 0 37 1.007318 10.240.47.86 10.16.37.96...

...2K clients are suffering performance issues (in a switched LAN). Looking at the traffic with Ethereal (latest SVN), it looks like the client writes the data in *1 byte* pieces likes this (c=client, s=server): c->s NT Create AndX Request c<-s NT Create AndX Response c->s Trans2 Request, SET_FILE_INFO c<-s Trans2 Response c->s Trans2 Request, QUERY_FILE_INFO, Query File Basic Info (1004) c<-s Trans2 Response c->s Write AndX Request, 1 byte at offset 119 <-- sigh c<-s Write AndX Response, 1 byte c->s Trans2 Request, QUERY_FILE_INFO, Query File Standard Info (258) c<-s Tra...

...ies on the Samba-Server from WinXP machines. I can't send my Ethereal-Logs to the list, but i send them to Jeremy, who never answered me anyway. If anyone can help me or would like to see the Ethereal-Logs, with the fact, that Windows sometimes (in faultcase) sends an other request ("SET_FILE_INFO") to delete a directory and this request does not work with Samba, just write back and I'll send you the files. By the way: The normal request seems to be "Delete Directory Request (0x01)". As I already said, I don't know, why Windows starts behaving like that irregulary...

...SMB functionality into one of my existing programs using libsmbclient. The interface has everything I need, except for the ability to shrink files (basically do an ftruncate). Looking at some ethereal captures, it looks like when a client wants to do a shrink of a file, it issues a TRANS2 with SET_FILE_INFO and SMB_FILE_END_OF_FILE_INFO, and SMB_FILE_ALLOCATION_INFO. Is there any way I can approximate this using the current smbc_* functions, or do I have to write it myself? Thanks in advance for any replies. From, Chris Lalancette (P.S. Please CC me on any correspondence; I am not subscribed t...

...SuSE 8.1/samba 2.2.7 server ================================= ================================ Tr2 Rq Q_PATH_INFO, Path: Tr2 Rs Q_PATH_INFO Tr2 Rq FIND_FIRST2, Pattern: \dir Tr2 Rs FIND_FIRST2, Files: dir NT Create AndX Req, Path: \dir NT Create AndX Resp, FID: 0x2f70 Tr2 Rq SET_FILE_INFO, FID: 0x2f70 Tr2 Rs SET_FILE_INFO Close Request, FID 0x270 Close Response nfs>netbios-ssn[ACK]... The log at level 3 shows no error: smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 35 of length 79 smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBtran...

Improving Samba write performance on Linux ------------------------------------------ Abstract -------- Samba performance is good in most circumstances, but modern Linux distributions have improved file systems since Samba was first developed. In particular, they have a feature that Samba does not take advantage of by default. In recent work I found that making some simple changes to Samba could

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as