search for: sesrious

...removed the > GPL incompatible clause, with the Revised BSD License being recognized > as both open source and GPL-compatible. But that hasn't - and > probably can't - happen with CDDL, so the only working option is dual > licensing. It seems that you are not interested in a sesrious discussion. The 4-clause BSD license is not a valid OSS license and all original BSD code was converted by addict of the president of UC-Berleley. So you claim that there is 4-clause BSD code in the Linux kernel? You are kidding :-( J?rg -- EMail:joerg at schily.net (home...

...incompatible clause, with the Revised BSD License being recognized >> as both open source and GPL-compatible. But that hasn't - and >> probably can't - happen with CDDL, so the only working option is dual >> licensing. > > It seems that you are not interested in a sesrious discussion. Not unless it is about how you or anyone else would be hurt by a dual license. Anything else is just ranting on both our parts. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > >> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal > >> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same > >> process at runtime unless there is an alternate