search for: seshadri

...raph the data sent through all configured classes or qdiscs. I could not find anything. Could someone tell me if a GUI exists or a graphing utility for tc? If my post is a repeat, could someone tell me where the archive is? I''ll search the archive, before posting here. Thank you, Deepak Seshadri _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

As reported in an earlier thread (http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Disable-memset-synthesis-tp4057810.html), we noticed in some cases that the llvm.memset intrinsic, if lowered to stores, could help with performance. Here's a test case: If LIMIT is > 8, I see that a call to memset is emitted for arm & aarch64, but not for x86 target. typedef struct { int v0[100]; }

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Tim Northover via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 15 August 2017 at 19:38, bharathi seshadri via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I find that GCC has an option -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns that > > can be used to disable memcpy/memset synthesis. I wonder if there is > > something similar in llvm/clang. > > I have no idea what that me...

...to know if there is a way to save these commands through the IP route 2 utility. Doesn''t ip route 2 utility offer a way to save the configurations/commands? Does it save the settings in some files, may be in /etc or some directory? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Deepak Seshadri Technical Support Engineer Broadband Maritime, Inc. 61 Broadway, Suite 1905 New York, NY 10006 Tel: 1-212-405-1055 Fax: 1-212-214-0949 E-mail: dseshadri@broadbandmaritime.com This message is for the named person''s use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged ma...

...--paulr > > > > *From:* cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of *Reid > Kleckner via cfe-dev > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 1:39 PM > *To:* Tim Northover > *Cc:* LLVM Developers Mailing List; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org Developers; > bharathi seshadri > *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Disable memset synthesis > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Tim Northover via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 15 August 2017 at 19:38, bharathi seshadri via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org&gt...

Our application is 32-bit big-endian ARM and we use -O3 with LTO. clang optimizes certain initialization of structures to zero with calls to memset, which are not further lowered to move instructions. Investigating perf reports, it looks like it may be beneficial to disable this optimization that introduces a function call to memset in certain hot paths. I tried passing -fno-builtin, but that

...totally makes sense to lower is.constant and objectsize in the same place. I'm just saying that if the ideal piece of code to do that isn't CGP, ...) On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:21 PM Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 6/28/2018 9:44 PM, Bharathi Seshadri via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have come across a couple of cases where the code generated after > > CodeGenPrepare pass has "br i1 false .." with both true and false > > conditions preserved and this propagates further and remains the same > > i...

Hi, I’m facing a crash issue (--target=arm-linux-gnueabi -march=armv8-a+crc -mfloat-abi=hard) and debugging the problem, I found that an intended branch was not taken due to bad code generation after the Post RA Scheduler pass. A CMPri instruction after an INLINEASM block (which inturn contains a cmp, bne instruction) is being moved before the INLINEASM block incorrectly resulting in two

Hi, I have come across a couple of cases where the code generated after CodeGenPrepare pass has "br i1 false .." with both true and false conditions preserved and this propagates further and remains the same in the final assembly code/executable. In CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction, ConstantFoldTerminator (which handles the br i1 false condition) is called only once and if after the

Hi all Iam trying to implement "route add " using netlink. The changes are not reflected in the routing table. I have given my code and screen shots of the routing tables. Can anybody tell me is there any mistake iam making in defining the fields . or any other mistake iam commiting thanxs viji //////////////////////////////////// CODE

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

Hi, I’m using _mm_storel_epi64/ _mm_loadl_epi64 in my test case as below and generating 32-bit code (using -m32 and -msse4.2). The 64-bit load and 64-bit store operations are replaced with two 32-bit mov instructions, presumably due to the use of uint64_t type. If I use __m128i instead of uint64_t everywhere, then the read and write happen as 64-bit operations using the xmm registers as expected.