search for: servicenow

...t up in the last year but apparently these settings have solved that issue. May I ask you guys to please have a look at the files and share your suggestions if there is any. Many thanks in advance Regards Tony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j

...a default route to eth1 in the default table. The problem is, this only works with 1 ISP, as I can''t add 3 default routes. So what is the best way to manage this ? Thanks for your attention. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j

...S_OK", "localAddress": null, "remoteAddress": "ipv4:172.16.202.22:41699", "serviceDescription": "Kerberos KDC", "authDescription": "ENC-TS Pre-authentication", "clientDomain": null, "clientAccount": "servicenow at ktkbankltd", "workstation": null, "becameAccount": "Servicenow", "becameDomain": "KTKBANKLTD", "becameSid": "S-1-5-21-2327230821-3654296898-2374465889-86939", "mappedAccount": "Servicenow", "mappe...

Hello Rowland, 1. We always have been using self compiled samba not the binaries. In fact, when we started we started on CentOS and then when CentOS became an upstream edition, we moved to RHEL, but continued with self compiled samba, never moved to prebuilt binaries. 2. SSSD - We are not using sssd anywhere. We have many Linux Servers but those are not members of AD domain. Only the web

...he file /etc/shorewall-lite/state/firewall does not exist" As expected creating the file "firewall" in /etc/shorewall-lite/ does not help so if any one can assist fixing it I would be appreciated!:) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu...

...2 0x20000 - ppp0 - track,balance=1 I would also like to have fallback between them so that if one is disconnected, all packets can go through the other one. How can I achieve this? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu...

...lar) one can tinker with settings almost endlessly in either side, probably being able to end up with specific situations where one or the other would be advantageous. At first sight, however, the overall difference seems to be small. On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:33 AM Tim Broberg <Tim.Broberg at servicenow.com> wrote: > Those are all good points. > > A few more to consider: > 1 - You may want to exert more effort compressing your rsync traffic than > you would want to apply across the board in ssh. > 2 - You *know* rsync supports compression on both sides. You don't > nec...

Rsync supports the capability of compressing data before sending. So does OpenSSH. It would be probably be a waste of resources and time to enable both compression capabilities at the same time, but it is not clear to me whether, in general, it makes better sense to enable rsync compression or SSH compression. My first thought would be that SSH compression might yield better results, on the

...t;     device=eth1     ttl=2 } connection {     name=free     checkip=<EXTERNAL_IP_FREE>     device=eth2     ttl=2 } connection {     name=ovh     checkip=<EXTERNAL_IP_OVH>     device=eth3     ttl=2 } ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu...

On 09/22/2017 06:55 PM, Tim Broberg wrote: > Do I understand correctly, that you find the security of group 14 unacceptable and yet you left it enabled? In the end, I'm trying to ensure a minimum equivalent of 128-bits of security. Group14 is 2048-bits, which roughly translates to 112-bits. [1] To this end, I disabled the "diffie-hellman-group14-sha1" and

Hi I''m running on a debian box shorewall-4.5.17. My main gateway is a router running on openwrt and I want to use the shorewall-lite packet provided by openwrt. The openwrt''s provided shorewall-lite packet is 4.5.7. So my questions would be: 1: Do I need to make some modifications before installing shorewall-core-4.5.7/shorewall-4.5.7 on my debian box? 2: if I have both

On 09/22/2017 03:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2017-09-21 18:12:44 -0400, Joseph S Testa II wrote: >> I gotta say... having a fallback mechanism here seems pretty >> strange. The entire point of the group exchange is to use a dynamic >> group and not a static one. > > fwiw, i think dynamic groups for DHE key exchange is intrinsically > problematic

I use since a lot of time a "classical" two-interfaces setup, with the net interface connected to an ADSL modem in half-bridge mode, which receives a public IP from the ISP and gives it to the Linux net interface; the lan interface has the 192.168.30.0/24 class. Now I need to change this setup, because my new ISP (that will switch soon to a FTTS VDSL2 connection) sent me a VDSL2

I had opened a thread a while ago in regards to dsync duplicate delivery issues. Here is an update in case anybody else is suffering from this: https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-April/103973.html We are using an LDAP backend for userdb and passdb lookups and this is causing multiple replication users to be created. Here is the broken setup: ###############################################

Is anyone aware of a method to force termination of a single channel without waiting for the associated process to complete? I have a use case where my client submits several commands to be executed over the same session at the same time on separate channels. In some cases (cough df), one or more those commands may hang indefinitely. I detect that the command is not finishing in a reasonable