search for: sequentiality

G''day, all, So, I''ve decided to migrate my home server from Linux+swRAID+LVM to Solaris+ZFS, because it seems to hold much better promise for data integrity, which is my primary concern. However, naturally, I decided to do some benchmarks in the process, and I don''t understand why the results are what they are. I though I had a reasonable understanding of ZFS, but now

Hi R-Masters I need use a sequential approach in serie of cases, but may data is not normal. If data is normal distribution is very easy create analysis using likelihood ratio like of Wald test. But in my case I need use a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney). I was use: RSiteSearch("sequential rank test") but not solve my problem. Do you know routine or package implement

(Yes, today is the "John has an idea day") So, in my now fairly extensive coding of extension priority lists, I'm getting very bored of re-numbering my priority lists every time I add something at the top of the list. If I have a 7 step priority list, and I need to add something in at priority 2, then I have to re-number five other priorities, and if my Dial statement is

Please reread my point #1: the tests of the (individual) coefficients in the model summary are not the same as the ANOVA tests. There is a certain correspondence between the two (i.e. between the coding of your categorical variables and the type of sum of squares; and for a model with a single predictor, F=t^2), but they are not the same in general. The t-test in the model coefficients is simply

Hi, I've got a new server with a 3ware 9550SXU with the Battery. I am using FreeBSD 7.0-Release (tried both 4BSD and ULE) using AMD64 and the 3ware performance for writes is just plain horrible. Something is obviously wrong but I'm not sure what. I've got a 4 disk RAID 10 array. According to 3dm2 the cache is on. I even tried setting The StorSave preference to

(This time with the r-help in the recipients...) Be careful when mixing lme4 and lmerTest together -- lmerTest extends and changes the behavior of various lme4 functions. >From the help page for lme4-anova (?lme4::anova.merMod) > ?anova?: returns the sequential decomposition of the contributions > of fixed-effects terms or, for multiple arguments, model >

I''ve been looking into the performance impact of NCQ. Here''s what i found out: http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/ncq_performance_analysis Curiously, there''s not too much performance data on NCQ available via a google search ... enjoy, eric

Hi, After building R 2.14.1 on a Linux system (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) ), I ran "make check" but it halted with the foll error: Testing examples for package ?base? Error: testing 'base' failed Execution halted I looked in <build dir>/test/Examples/base-Ex.Rout.fail and found the foll: *******EXCERPT ***** ... > ### ------- Pickyness Flags :

Hi All, I''ve just built an 8 disk zfs storage box, and I''m in the testing phase before I put it into production. I''ve run into some unusual results, and I was hoping the community could offer some suggestions. I''ve bascially made the switch to Solaris on the promises of ZFS alone (yes I''m that excited about it!), so naturally I''m looking

I'm setting up a new fileserver. It has two RAID controllers, a PERC 3/DI providing mirrored system disks and a PERC 3/DC providing a 1TB RAID5 volume consisting of eight 144GB U160 drives. This will serve NFS, Samba and sftp clients for about 200 users. The logical drive was created with the following settings: RAID = 5 stripe size = 32kb write policy = wrback read policy =

if you have N processes reading the same file sequentially (where file size is much greater than physical memory) from the same starting position, should I expect that all N processes finish in the same time as if it were a single process? In other words, if you have one process that reads blocks from a file, is it "free" (meaning no additional total I/O cost) to have another process

You can use these flags as described in the manual page to optimize access patterns, and to get better behaviour with the page cache in some scenarios. For my testing I used the cachedel and cachestats utilities written by Julius Plenz (https://github.com/Feh/nocache). I started with a 32 GB file of random data on a machine with about 32 GB of RAM. At the beginning of the test I evicted the

Hi I am performing an analysis of variance with two factors, each with two levels. I have differing numbers of observations in each of the four combinations, but all four combinations *are* present (2 of the factor combinations have 3 observations, 1 has 4 and 1 has 5) I have used both anova(aov(...)) and anova(lm(...)) in R and it gave the same result - as expected. I then plugged this into

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Hi all,<br> <br> In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4 to know which filesystem is better for

Instead of using sequential integers for IDs for my objects I was wondering if I could easily make it so that my IDs where longer auto- generated random strings/integers. So instead of: http://www.mydomain.com/user/view/1 Would be: http://www.mydomain.com/user/view/d81096b87a7c5565f On top of that... is there big benefits for security reasons to use non-sequential numbers? Is it worth

I wantto run sequential ANOVAs (i.e. type I sums of squares), and trying to getresults including ANOVA tables and associated coefficients for predictive variables(I am using the R 3.4.2 version). I think ANOVA tables look right, but believecoefficients are wrong. Specifically, it looks like that the coefficients arefrom ANOVA with ?marginal? (type III sums of squares). I have tried both lme

On 8/7/20 6:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > You can use these flags as described in the manual page to optimize > access patterns, and to get better behaviour with the page cache in > some scenarios. And if you guess wrong, it is only a performance penalty, not a correctness issue. > > For my testing I used the cachedel and cachestats utilities written by > Julius Plenz

[my original message to s-news & r-help is attached ] No one possessed or knew of any S/R code for the sequential t-test. Also it doesn't appear in the SAS index. One or two suggested obtaining the S+ seqtrial software which may (or may not) cover this, but this seemed to be a bit of a "hammer to crack a nut". I have written a function based on the treatment in Wetheril

My unit's firmware: library 05.03, tape d22h, shows the device as set to random mode. But mtx -f /dev/st0 status gives an error that google says the device is in sequential mode. dmesg|grep -i hp does reflect CentOS thinks the device is a sequential unit. I've tried this with Fedora 8, too, and both show the same, so it is either an issue with CentOS/Fedora RPMs, or the version of

Just starting to learn R so excuse me if this is a simple question. I'm wondering how I get the percent difference in sequential values in one column of a dataframe. If I had a dataframe and one of the columns was "value", how would I go about calculating (v2-v1)/v1 ....(v3-v2)/v2 ....(v4-v3)/v3 ...etc ? -- View this message in context: