Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "seqpacket".
Did you mean:
sendpacket
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...rote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any
> > > additional requirements for devices and drivers implementing this
> > > feature.
> &...
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...rote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any
> > > additional requirements for devices and drivers implementing this
> > > feature.
> &...
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any
> > > > > additional requirements for devices and drivers implementing this...
2023 Sep 02
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...:35PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any
> > > > > additional requirements for devices and drivers implementing this...
2023 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
...gt; > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > > > > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> > > > > > > message types and header fields are extended to support datagrams.
> > > > > > > Semantic differences between the flow types are stated, as well as any
> > > > > > > additional requirements for devices...
2023 Aug 04
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
...ock, struct msghdr *msg,
>>> ??????????? err = total_written;
>>> ????}
>>> out:
>>> +??? if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>>> +??????? err = sk_stream_error(sk, msg->msg_flags, err);
>>
>> Do you know why we don't need this for SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM?
>
>Yes, here is my explanation:
>
>This function checks that input error is SIGPIPE, and if so it sends SIGPIPE to the 'current' thread
>(except case when MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is set). This behaviour is described in POSIX:
>
>Page 367 (description of define...
2023 Aug 04
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
...? err = total_written;
>>>>> ????}
>>>>> out:
>>>>> +??? if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>>>>> +??????? err = sk_stream_error(sk, msg->msg_flags, err);
>>>>
>>>> Do you know why we don't need this for SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM?
>>>
>>> Yes, here is my explanation:
>>>
>>> This function checks that input error is SIGPIPE, and if so it sends SIGPIPE to the 'current' thread
>>> (except case when MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is set). This behaviour is described in POSI...
2023 Aug 22
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
...? err = total_written;
>>>>> ????}
>>>>> out:
>>>>> +??? if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>>>>> +??????? err = sk_stream_error(sk, msg->msg_flags, err);
>>>>
>>>> Do you know why we don't need this for SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM?
>>>
>>> Yes, here is my explanation:
>>>
>>> This function checks that input error is SIGPIPE, and if so it sends SIGPIPE to the 'current' thread
>>> (except case when MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is set). This behaviour is described in POSI...
2023 Aug 22
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
...gt; ????}
>>>>>>> out:
>>>>>>> +??? if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>>>>>>> +??????? err = sk_stream_error(sk, msg->msg_flags, err);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know why we don't need this for SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, here is my explanation:
>>>>>
>>>>> This function checks that input error is SIGPIPE, and if so it sends SIGPIPE to the 'current' thread
>>>>> (except case when MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is s...
2023 Mar 10
0
[PATCH net-next v3 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap
...pf: rename vsock_dgram_* -> vsock_*
> - vsock/bpf: change sk_psock_{get,put} and {lock,release}_sock() order
> to minimize slock hold time
> - vsock/bpf: use "new style" wait
> - vsock/bpf: fix bug in wait log
> - vsock/bpf: add check that recvmsg sk_type is one dgram, seqpacket, or
> stream. Return error if not one of the three.
> - virtio/vsock: comment __skb_recv_datagram() usage
> - virtio/vsock: do not init copied in read_skb()
> - vsock/bpf: add ifdef guard around struct proto in dgram_recvmsg()
> - selftests/bpf: add vsock loopback config for aarch...
2011 Aug 18
4
[RFC 0/0] Introducing a generic socket offload framework
...EATS
-------
* We're currently hooked into too many socket calls. We should be able to
reduce the number of hooks to 3 (__sock_create(), sys_connect(), sys_bind()).
* Our 'hw_socket' component should be folded into a netdev so we can leverage
NAPI.
* We don't handle SOCK_SEQPACKET, SOCK_RAW, SOCK_RDM, or SOCK_PACKET sockets.
* We don't currently have support for /proc/net. Our current plan is to
add '/proc/net/hwsock' (filename TBD) and add support for these sockets
to the net-tools packages (netstat & friends), rather than muck around with
plumbin...
2011 Aug 18
4
[RFC 0/0] Introducing a generic socket offload framework
...EATS
-------
* We're currently hooked into too many socket calls. We should be able to
reduce the number of hooks to 3 (__sock_create(), sys_connect(), sys_bind()).
* Our 'hw_socket' component should be folded into a netdev so we can leverage
NAPI.
* We don't handle SOCK_SEQPACKET, SOCK_RAW, SOCK_RDM, or SOCK_PACKET sockets.
* We don't currently have support for /proc/net. Our current plan is to
add '/proc/net/hwsock' (filename TBD) and add support for these sockets
to the net-tools packages (netstat & friends), rather than muck around with
plumbin...