search for: sentec

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "sentec".

Did you mean: sentenc
2004 Apr 28
2
About TE405P Digium Card
Hi Everybody, Is there anyone who already uses Asterisk with TE405P card? Is this card going well with the old E400P or T400P drivers? Are there a lot of differences? In the card's data sheet writes this sentece: "Digium has designed the TE405P to be fully compatible with existing software applications..." Is this meaning the the old drivers are also OK for this card? Thank you in advice. Csaba P?csai
2012 Mar 21
2
Echo cancellation with different sound card for speaker and microphone
...a no-go for us. There is no way I can get the customers to understand why they can't use e.g the microphone in their webcam together with the speakers connected to the built-in soundcard, and have to go buying a separate microphone. In the release notes for 1.2beta2, there is the following sentece however: "The echo canceller should now converge faster, be robust and tolerant of incorrect capture-playback synchronisation." This sounds for me like the above problem has been solved, or that at least it now works in some cases even if the speakers and microphone are unsynchroniz...
2007 Aug 19
16
Possible memory leak problem...
I''m trying to figure out a possible memory leak problem I have in my application. I''ve tested both with mongrel and webrick and the problem remains. So I think it''s not a mongrel problem, but I''m posting here to see if anybody can help me. The RAILS application is quite simple, no special plugins ( no RMagick that has the memory problem ),
2012 Jun 13
2
need help
hello could you help in solving the following problem I want to replace same consecutive words by a single word in a sentence.. for example --- my name name name is micky so I want the output like this--my name is micky I want this solution for a text file can you tell me the code for it?? thanking you in anticipation -- Shilpa Rai MSc.(2011-2013) Applied Statistics and Informatics Indian
2019 Nov 18
5
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
> > Only a single LGTM is required. Reviewers are expected to only LGTM > patches they're confident in their knowledge of. Reviewers may review > and provide suggestions, but explicitly defer LGTM to someone else. > This is encouraged and a good way for new contributors to learn the code. Whilst I get what you're trying to say, I'm not particularly comfortable with