search for: senstivity

Hi, I have mail box info at mydomain.com stored in MySQL db. But dovecot is allowing me to login as both INFO at MYDOMAIN.COM info at mydomain.com Shows two mail boxes. The small letter account is the one mail server really deliver all mails. Is there any way i can specify all login names are small letters, so that user always access real mail box ? Regards, Yujin

I'm using exim4 to deliver into dovecot 1.1, and using plus-addressing to deliver mailing lists directly to appropriate folders in my "lists" mailbox. I created a file called /folder-map.lists that looks like ## folder-map.lists dovecot: Dovecot lpedge: Linux PowerEdge ... and so on. So mail to lists-lpedge at jay.fm goes to the "Linux PowerEdge" folder. The one

> I want to have it case-insensitive again, like in Pigeonhole version 0.4.24 i would also plea for making it case-insensitive again! We were hit by this too, and I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive! Sincerly, Klaus Steinberger -- Rechnerbetriebsgruppe / IT, Fakult?t f?r Physik Klaus Steinberger FAX: +49 89 28914280 Tel: +49 89 28914287 --------------

> > Anyone knows if there is a way to connect R with the ERP SAP? Very big question. An ERP is an accounting system typically for a large business or governmental entity (ERP = "Enterprise Resource Planning" system). Modern ERPs are typically built on top of (multi-user) relational data base management systems (RDBMS). R has many ways to connect to relational databases -- see

Is it possible for dovecot to strip realms and force lowercasing of usernames? We have a lot of dumb customers who try logging in to pop3 with crap like UsERNAmE and bla at nonexistentdomain.com. All our usernames are lowercase and we have no realms. Trying to get hundreds of customers to fix this is hard and is a significant and costly support burden. It would be nice if dovecot could handle

Hi George, Tow months ago, we talked about how to reduce the scheduling latency for a specific VM which runs a mixed workload, where the boost mechanism can not works well. I have tried some methods to reduce the scheduling latency for some assumed latency-sensitive VMs and got some progress on it. Now I hope to make it on demand. That is to say, I hope to get the scheduler to determine the

First let me confess that I am a R-novice. I am trying to fit a beta distribution for a dataset using fitdistr(MASS). I am having difficulties with it because the function tends to fit a distribution with a range of 0 to 1 (I guess). However, my dataset is not! Anytips or tricks will be very much appreciated. Many Thanks. T. S. Ramanarayanan, Ph.D. Aventis CropScience Research Triangle Park,

This applies to the OpenBSD --current tree. Don't see why it shouldn't work under portable. Within the patch are the updates I need to make before I'll actually submit it for real, but I figured I'd make a public drop. Since I'm not on this list anymore keep me in the CC: if you want me to respond. I'll continue to work as time permits, but it would be nice if people

I've finally took the time to figure the last few bugs (that I know of). This patch will be submit to be included in a few weeks. This patch should be generic enough for portable without too much hassle. This patch mimics OpenBSD's ftp behavior. I'm not sure like that (e.g. it doesn't put / at the end of directories by default), but that is more a question for the community

Hello everyone, I''ve got a Rails app that''s going to replace an in-house application, where the customers are used to having to deal with maintaining their own servers and data. As these are non-IT customers, maintaining servers and data is a long way from their core business and thus quite costly for them. I''m hoping to slice their costs by removing the requirement

Accidentally sent to uiuc server. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you compare your results with another approach: simply do not > instrument the top 1% hottest functions (by function entry count)? If this > simple approach provides most of the benefits (my measurements on one > codebase I tested show that it would eliminate

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Accidentally sent to uiuc server. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you compare your results

Instrumentation based Profile Guided Optimization (PGO) is a compiler technique that leverages important program runtime information, such as precise edge counts and frequent value information, to make frequently executed code run faster. It's proven to be one of the most effective ways to improve program performance. An important design point of PGO is to decide where to place the