search for: seized

? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era indicato... Nome: non disponibile Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070905/6d1002c1/attachment.pl

Hi! In wiki -> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Difference_of_Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles "If the DC is broken (e. g. hardware defect) and will never come back again, then you can seize the role on a remaining DC. It is very important that the old DC will never be connected to the network again, if it is connected again, this will cause

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I lost my DC with all fsmo-roles. I try to "seize" the roles to another DC. It worked four out of five roles: root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid Attempting transfer... Transfer unsuccessful, seizing... FSMO seize of 'rid' role successful root at SVL-V-AD1:~# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=pdc Attempting

Hello, I''m attempting to run Windows XP in a domU using the PCs actual graphics card. I believe I''ve set everything up correctly, including the pciback module etc. I''ve set pciback to grab the graphics card and all the USB hosts as well: (from dmesg) pciback 0000:00:02.0: seizing device pciback 0000:00:02.1: seizing device pciback 0000:00:1a.0: seizing device pciback

So not the problem of using "seize" when both the OLD-FSMO server and NOVO-FSMo are active and on the network? The problem is to use "seize" if OLD-FSMO is not on the network and then come back? If I understood how it would be .... Regards; On 06-06-2018 15:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:35:29 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at

I am running debian lenny, with the standard Xen 3.2 packages, with the 2.6.18-6-xen-686 kernel as dom0, and 2.6.24-1-xen-686 as domU. Everything is working fine apart from the console and the PCI passthrough. I am getting these errors in the domU on startup: XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/pci/0 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0 Does this mean the modules are missing?

The upgrade shouldn't have touched the Samba database, just the binaries etc, so check the smb.conf file and recreate it if you cannot find it, or if it is incorrect. The smb.conf still exists [global] workgroup = IUMNET realm = IUMNET.EDU.NA netbios name = IUMDCDP01 server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 172.16.10.254

...help' > > From the output of the above command, you should be able to work out > the command to seize the FSMO roles to this DC is: > > samba-tool fsmo seize --role=all --force -UAdministrator > > You will be prompted for a password > > The roles should be now be 'seized' to this DC. > > You can use another user instead of 'Administrator', but the user must > have the required permissions. > > you use '--force' to stop the command trying to transfer the roles, > this will fail because the old DC is offline, so why bother ;-) &g...

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. > > Can I simply seize these roles? > > [root at larkin27 ~]#

Hello list: Sorry for my ignorance but anyone could you tell me if is possible setting automatic transference or seize fsmo roles on samba4, to avoid manual action over server, such as HA, i mean in case that my fsmo role owner crash. Best regard.

On 04/08/2019 18:17, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: > Hi, > > > Maybe the output of 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --help' should include > the > -U parameter and its purpose in the current context... > > I've done this > > samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=domaindns -Uadministrator > * The 'domaindns' role does not have an FSMO roleowner > That is

...Now enter 'samba-tool fsmo seize --help' From the output of the above command, you should be able to work out the command to seize the FSMO roles to this DC is: samba-tool fsmo seize --role=all --force -UAdministrator You will be prompted for a password The roles should be now be 'seized' to this DC. You can use another user instead of 'Administrator', but the user must have the required permissions. you use '--force' to stop the command trying to transfer the roles, this will fail because the old DC is offline, so why bother ;-) I will leave you to work out...

But, if you use the "seizi" dc that no longer has the FSMO should be removed from the network, right? Regards; On 06-06-2018 11:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:24:33 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The problem with this is that both Dcs will continue on the >> network ... I

Hi, I am still trying to assign pci or usbs to a domU. I get to the point where pciback seizes the devices (5 usb and 2 pci). I modified the configuration of the domU with pci = [ ''00:1d.0'' , ''00:1d.1'' , ''00:1d.2'' , ''00:1d.3'' , ''00:1d.7'', ''02:01.0'' , ''02:02.0'' ] but

> You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > Just what version of Samba are you using ? My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. Can I simply seize these roles? [root at larkin27 ~]# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=TEMP2008R2DC,CN=Servers,.. InfrastructureMasterRole owner:

Hi, I have three R2 installation on different carriers, all shows the same inconsistency at varying degree. But, on most test calls we made, it reaches T3. The worst part of these, the carrier claims that it's my R2 box that is not responding in time. Please, check the attached file and take note of the timestamp, you'll find that in some call, it already contradict what the carrier

On 02/10/15 20:09, Yosel Lazaro Vera Gonzalez wrote: > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > Para: samba at lists.samba.org > Enviados: Viernes, 2 de Octubre 2015 3:54:04 > Asunto: Re: [Samba] transfer fsmo role using ldap > > On 02/10/15 04:27, Yosel Lazaro Vera Gonzalez wrote: >> !!!Regards >>

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:38:16 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > > My Samba 4.5.2

On 12/07/16 13:33, Jason Waters wrote: > This is what I would do. > > 1. Make sure everything is off of the 2008 machine so you don't need to > turn it back on > 2. Shut down the 2008 machine > 2.5 Update your DNS on the samba machine to be the samba machine, not the > 2008 DC > 3. Test everything and make sure samba is fully working on your domain > 4. Test

I have a pdc samba 3+openldap+debian 5 and I need to migrate the ad windows (2003,2008 or 2012). How can I do this? -- Atenciosamente, Thiago Fortes Administrador de Redes DigithoBrasil 67 3345-6565