search for: segregating

All, I am deploying on a production system using Apache/fastcgi. I would like Apache to take care of all of my static files and dispatch.fcgi to take care of all of my Ruby templates. In order to achieve this separation, do I need to set up two vhosts in Apache, one to serve static content and one to serve dynamic content? Has anyone done this in production and can point me to the right

I'm wondering how prevalent the practice of physically segregating voice and data networks is in the Real World. What are the factors that typically lead to such a decision? DIscussions of pros and cons are most welcome by me. Experiences, anybody? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: applicatio...

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Phil Pennock <phil.pennock at globnix.org> wrote: > On 2015-05-30 at 15:00 +0200, Kasper Dupont wrote: >> On my laptop I have key1 and key2. I can use key1 to log in >> on server1, and I can use key2 to log in on server2. I want >> neither key to leave the laptop, and only key2 is allowed >> to be forwarded to other hosts. >

Hello DWARF fans, I've just posted a set of four refactoring patches for DebugInfo/DWARF, which move in the direction of handling DWARF v4 or v5 type units and compile units more coherently. In DWARF v4, type units and compile units are strictly segregated into the .debug_types and .debug_info sections, respectively. This division was pretty ingrained into how DebugInfo/DWARF handled the

Hi All, It's my pleasure to announce the Diversity and Inclusion in Compilers and Tools workshop that will be held on the afternoon of April 5th, at the same venue as the EuroLLVM'20. This event features speakers and discussion aiming to increase diversity and inclusion within the LLVM community, attendee's workplace or university, and within the field of compilers and tools. It is

I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even possible or realistic? I understand the idea of how that would be secure, much like creating a virtual machine to

I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to reach passwords database. And I want to segregate roles of the servers. If I will setup dovecot locally I will still have to provide it access to database (eg. /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext). On 27 Mar 2015, at 15:49, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:34: >>

...ve the line > if it is getting its IP via DHCP. > > Rowland That little trick is used so that contacts to the loopback, at 127.0.0.0/8, can be set to a distinct IP address and ensure the trafic is recorded separately, even though coming in on the loopback address. It can be very handy for segregating SSH and webshost traffic separately from localhost traffic.

Hi, I need to support port ranges in tc filter rules. I know how to formulate the rule but , I am not able to understand how to calculate the mask value for a perticular range so as to segregate the port values that lie within this range . I got the following sample "tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:1 protocol ip prio 10 u32 match ip sport 0x1ae0 0x1ff0 flowid 1:10 This rule will match all

Hello All, I was wondering if I could do the following on asterisk... Get a T1 between 2 locations, and split it into a data channel of like 1024, and use the rest for voice channels. Has anyone done this and had it working well? Or would I need to get a csu that allows a split into two interfaces? Regards, Greg

Hello, Dirk (and everybody): I have Ubuntu on some systems and I notice there's a very nice thing you do with your R packages. The system is setup so that packages installed from deb go into /usr/lib/R, while packages built from scratch by root go into /usr/local/.., and if the user runs install.packages(), then it gets dumped into the user's own account. I'm much more familiar with

Pete Biggs wrote: > >> MAC addresses could be faked. >> >>> The PXE protocol, as far as I can see, has no concept of authorisation >>> - although its certainly possible to introduce it after PXE has done >>> its bit (but before imaging or whatever). >>> >>> You may be better off with authenticating the DHCP using RADIUS, but >>>

Is this the appropriate place for GSoC conversations? If I understand the proposal correctly, there should be a lexer (written in R) that exposes an API; that API would be used by segregated mini-parsers (Roclets) which do the dirty work of Roxygen -> {html, LaTeX, DocBook, ...} translation. The lexer should ship with a proof-of-concept Roclet. Have I missed anything?

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of David Chisnall > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Publication: Languages Used in LLVM During Compilation > How do I download it? The link sends me to a site with ads, then when I > find the little English icon, there's a download link that takes me to a > page with a picture telling me an

> On Jan 30, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 30 January 2014 20:33, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> Basically, compiler-rt contains the only runtime libraries we ship with Clang. The sanitizers are runtime libraries

Hi, I have an nxp data set of time series. For my final year project, I would like to partition this data set into a smaller number of units ( < n). Where each of the units contains time series that move closely together (i.e. in unison), and the "simmilarity" (in terms of occurence & amplitudes of peaks and troughs) between the segregated units is "low". I know

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> Again, I asked the LLVM list if, since LLVM is a typed assembly >> language, if I could just look for pointer plus offset followed by a >> dereference. They seemed to suggest that looking for that idiom would > JFTR, we're one big community, and it's not as segregated

Hi, I want to combine all the above mentioned technologies. The Linbit pages warn not to use the drbd: VBD with HVM DomUs. This page however: http://publications.jbfavre.org/virtualisation/cluster-xen-corosync-pacemaker-drbd-ocfs2.en (thank you Jean), simply puts two DRBD devices in dual primary mode and starts Xen DomUs while pointing to the DRBD devices with phy: in the DomU config files.

I''m looking for an easy way to have mongrel only serve dynamic railscontent, while letting Apache serve non-Rails content. Unfortunately,it seems that you have to segregate the static content in its ownfolder. That was also the case with the SCGI runner. I used thetrick outlined athttp://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rails/23347 to managethis. I was curious if a similar

Martin Apel wrote: > static LLVMContext context; That's your bug. Here's the situation that contexts help with. Suppose you write a library that uses LLVM under the hood (graphics, let's say), and I write another one that uses LLVM and does audio processing. Someone then decides to write a video game that uses both of our libraries. As long as we each use a separate context,