Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "segment_is_pnp_cod".
Did you mean:
segment_is_pnp_code
2007 Apr 18
2
[patch 3/8] Allow a kernel to not be in ring 0.
...c3-32.orig/arch/i386/mm/extable.c
+++ 2.6.18-rc3-32/arch/i386/mm/extable.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
#ifdef CONFIG_PNPBIOS
- if (unlikely((regs->xcs & ~15) == (GDT_ENTRY_PNPBIOS_BASE << 3)))
+ if (unlikely(SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE(regs->xcs)))
{
extern u32 pnp_bios_fault_eip, pnp_bios_fault_esp;
extern u32 pnp_bios_is_utter_crap;
--- 2.6.18-rc3-32.orig/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
+++ 2.6.18-rc3-32/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/kdebug...
2007 Apr 18
2
[patch 3/8] Allow a kernel to not be in ring 0.
...c3-32.orig/arch/i386/mm/extable.c
+++ 2.6.18-rc3-32/arch/i386/mm/extable.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
#ifdef CONFIG_PNPBIOS
- if (unlikely((regs->xcs & ~15) == (GDT_ENTRY_PNPBIOS_BASE << 3)))
+ if (unlikely(SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE(regs->xcs)))
{
extern u32 pnp_bios_fault_eip, pnp_bios_fault_esp;
extern u32 pnp_bios_is_utter_crap;
--- 2.6.18-rc3-32.orig/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
+++ 2.6.18-rc3-32/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/kdebug...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Slight cleanups for x86 ring macros (against rc3-mm2)
...* 8)
-/*
- * Some tricky tests to match code segments after a fault
- */
+/* Matches __KERNEL_CS and __USER_CS (they must be 2 entries apart) */
#define SEGMENT_IS_FLAT_CODE(x) (((x) & 0xec) == GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_CS * 8)
+/* Matches PNP_CS32 and PNP_CS16 (they must be consecutive) */
#define SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE(x) (((x) & 0xf4) == GDT_ENTRY_PNPBIOS_BASE * 8)
/* Simple and small GDT entries for booting only */
@@ -118,8 +117,16 @@
*/
#define IDT_ENTRIES 256
-/* Bottom three bits of xcs give the ring privilege level */
-#define SEGMENT_RPL_MASK 0x3
+/* Bottom two bits of selector give the rin...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Slight cleanups for x86 ring macros (against rc3-mm2)
...* 8)
-/*
- * Some tricky tests to match code segments after a fault
- */
+/* Matches __KERNEL_CS and __USER_CS (they must be 2 entries apart) */
#define SEGMENT_IS_FLAT_CODE(x) (((x) & 0xec) == GDT_ENTRY_KERNEL_CS * 8)
+/* Matches PNP_CS32 and PNP_CS16 (they must be consecutive) */
#define SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE(x) (((x) & 0xf4) == GDT_ENTRY_PNPBIOS_BASE * 8)
/* Simple and small GDT entries for booting only */
@@ -118,8 +117,16 @@
*/
#define IDT_ENTRIES 256
-/* Bottom three bits of xcs give the ring privilege level */
-#define SEGMENT_RPL_MASK 0x3
+/* Bottom two bits of selector give the rin...
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should