search for: seeps

Dear everyone, I would like to create a kite chart in which I plot densities (width of the vertical kites) in relation to sediment depth (on reversed y-axis) for 6 different locations (Distances from seep site, on x-axis on top of the plot). The dataset I would like to use is: Distance_from_seep_site Sedimentdepth Density 1100 0 107.8 1100 1 264.6 1100 2 284.2

...means we get zero type safety and I'm not happy about it. > I didn't use this way because I don't want to include 'virtio-balloon.h' in page_alloc.c, > or copy the define of this struct in page_alloc.c > > Thanks! > Liang It's not good that virtio format seeps out to page_alloc anyway. If unavoidable it is not a good idea to try to hide this fact, people will assume they can change the format at will. -- MST

...means we get zero type safety and I'm not happy about it. > I didn't use this way because I don't want to include 'virtio-balloon.h' in page_alloc.c, > or copy the define of this struct in page_alloc.c > > Thanks! > Liang It's not good that virtio format seeps out to page_alloc anyway. If unavoidable it is not a good idea to try to hide this fact, people will assume they can change the format at will. -- MST

It seems a little strange conceptually that object depends on BitcodeReader. Is it possible to break that dependency? On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:11 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:52 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>

Just when I thought I couldn't be wrong, I was wrong. We have woodpeckers that drill into the arial telephone cables, and water seeps through the holes and partially grounds the tip and/or ring wires causing hum. I thought the hum/buz on my lines was a telco problem. The Qwest HQ noise team assures me that my lines are within spec. Sure enough, when I listen on the test set the lines are clear. The lines terminate at an Ad...

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:52 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a >>> few in the

No, Object is supposed to be an abstraction over real object files and LLVM bitcode object files. Maybe we can break the CodeView -> Object dependency. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:23 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > It seems a little strange conceptually that object depends on > BitcodeReader. Is it possible to break that dependency? > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:31 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a >> few in the CodeView handling, specifically: >> >> lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers

On unix, unless event polling is enabled Sys.sleep just waits in a select() call (with a SIGINT handler in place) so the elapsed time isn't checked until after the select call is complete. Rstudio uses event polling, and in particular sets R_wait_usec to 10000, which means event and interrupt checks happen during a Sys.seep call. The R GUI on macOS doesn't seem to do this (but my lldb

...39;VIRTIO_BALLOON_NR_PFN_BITS' is for this purpose and it will be passed to the related function in page_alloc.c as a parameter. Thanks! Liang > All the pointer math and void * means we get zero type safety and I'm not > happy about it. > > It's not good that virtio format seeps out to page_alloc anyway. > If unavoidable it is not a good idea to try to hide this fact, people will assume > they can change the format at will. > > -- > MST

Looks like maybe the CodeView -> Object dependency is out of date/old/not needed any more anyway... (don't see any Object headers included from the CodeView headers or implementation, etc). Will see if going that way internally is viable & loop back if it stumbles across something. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:27 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > No, Object is

Kicking the old tyre a bit once more: In my recent reading I saw "float charge", "float mode", "float voltage" etc. Maybe that is what I meant in the earlier discussion - similar concept, similar word. In case of PbAc per https://chargetek.com/basic-information.html : "Float mode is where the voltage on the battery is maintained at approximately 2.25 volts

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:52:26PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > > - /* We should always be able to add one buffer to an empty queue. */ > - virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, &sg, 1, vb, GFP_KERNEL); > - virtqueue_kick(vq); > +static void do_set_resp_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb, > + unsigned long base_pfn, int pages) > > - /* When host has read buffer, this completes via

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:52:26PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > > - /* We should always be able to add one buffer to an empty queue. */ > - virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, &sg, 1, vb, GFP_KERNEL); > - virtqueue_kick(vq); > +static void do_set_resp_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb, > + unsigned long base_pfn, int pages) > > - /* When host has read buffer, this completes via

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Thank you for looking into this Luke. > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: >> On unix, unless event polling is enabled Sys.sleep just waits in a >> select() call (with a SIGINT handler in place) so the elapsed time >> isn't checked until after the select call is complete.

Thank you for looking into this Luke. On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > On unix, unless event polling is enabled Sys.sleep just waits in a > select() call (with a SIGINT handler in place) so the elapsed time > isn't checked until after the select call is complete. Rstudio uses > event polling, and in particular sets R_wait_usec to 10000,

Hi all ! I just started writing specs on a new project. I would just like to validate that this is the way you would write it. I know about mocks, stubs and expectations. I don''t think this is a problem for me. My question really boils down to: def index @projects = current_user.projects.active end My spec needs to return the proxy, no ? Here''s my code: context "A

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:14:20PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:42:44PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > >> > >> Fixing address of powerpc mailing list. > >> > >> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.ibm.com>

Good afternoon, I have been developing in mod_perl for many years, and my livelihood is based on being productive with it. I''ve spent the past week reading and testing RoR and it does look good. But before I take the plunge for my next project, I was hoping to hear from other mod_perl switchers. One of the main reasons I like mod_perl is code flexibility. I like being able to insert

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> writes: >> "battery voltage is unreasonably high" is a reasonable concept. <...> I >> would not call it HB, though because that makes it sound parallel to LB, >> which is about believed remaining capacity, not detection of overcharging >> failure. > > Well, given that a "battery.charge.high" is