Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "seen_hol".
Did you mean:
seen_hole
2019 Jun 21
0
[libnbd PATCH v2 5/5] states: Add DF flag support for pread
...f[1024];
struct data {
- //XXX bool df; /* input: true if DF flag was passed to request */
+ bool df; /* input: true if DF flag was passed to request */
int count; /* input: count of expected remaining calls */
bool fail; /* input: true to return failure */
bool seen_hole; /* output: true if hole encountered */
@@ -60,15 +60,24 @@ read_cb (void *opaque, const void *bufv, size_t count, uint64_t offset,
switch (status) {
case LIBNBD_READ_DATA:
- // XXX if (df...)
- assert (buf == rbuf + 512);
- assert (count == 512);
- assert (offset == 2048 + 512...
2019 Jun 21
9
[libnbd PATCH v2 0/5] nbd_pread_structured
Since v1:
- rebase to applied patches
- split out support for Int in callbacks
- sort of test that callbacks work in OCaml (see comment in patch 5)
- rename API to nbd_pread_structured
- expose error as explicit parameter to callback
Eric Blake (5):
generator: Allow Int in callbacks
states: Wire in a read callback
states: Add nbd_pread_structured API
states: Add tests for
2019 Jun 18
17
[libnbd PATCH 0/8] Add nbd_pread_callback
I've mentioned this topic before (in fact, the idea of adding
NBD_CMD_FLAG_DF was first mentioned at [1]), but finally finished
enough of an implementation to feel confident in posting it.
I'd still like to add something under examples/ that uses the new API
to implement strict checking of a server's structured replies read
implementation (ensure that a server never sends data after