search for: securitys

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 496359 security Bug#496359: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages There were no tags set. Tags added: security > tags 496360 security Bug#496360: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages Tags were: confirmed Tags added: security > tags 496362 security

Hi, I wonder, how can i use openssh Public key authentification with ActivCard pkcs11 x509 certificate store and login to only my account reading/using username provided from certificate DN, or principal name,friendly name ? b111887 and e411617 is administrator on this os. I have rights to put e411617 pub keys to b111887 home folder authorized keys. And because openssh ask's me to provide

Quoting Karolin Seeger (kseeger at samba.org): > Release Announcements > ===================== > > This is a security release in order to address CVE-2010-2063. > > > o CVE-2010-2063: > In Samba 3.3.x and below, a buffer overrun is possible in chain_reply code. As this issue also affect the 3.2 series of samba (which is no longer officially supported by the Samba

Hi All :) What is the best way to get a list of available security updates? I found several commands for that: 1) yum updateinfo list updates -q --security 2) yum list-security --security -q 3) yum --security check-update -q Based on the sample output below I think I can use any of the three with some awk to get a list of packages. yum updateinfo list updates -q --security FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0525

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:46 AM JF Bastien <jfbastien at apple.com> wrote: > And I do agree that if someone were to come in and put in the significant > amounts of work to make LLVM directly usable in security-sensitive places, > then we could support that. But none of that should have anything to do > with the security group or its membership. All of that work and discussion,

Copies heavily after a similar addition recently made in nbdkit. --- I'm not sure if .1 or .3 fits better for the man page. With nbdkit, .1 made sense because 'nbdkit' is a standalone program; but with libnbd, our only standalone is nbdsh, yet naming it nbdsh-security seems off. docs/Makefile.am | 7 +++++++ docs/libnbd-security.pod | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello, There are several important security updates available: Critical: firefox security and bug fix update Important: tomcat5 security update Important: vsftpd security update Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update Important: logwatch security update Important: libtiff security update Moderate: kernel security and bug fix update Important: samba security update Important: samba3x

Hello, I am having a small issue with LDAP, and I hope someone here might be able to provide a few tips. I am unable to authenticate as user 'testuser' on server 'storage' and the following errors appear in /var/log/messages on server 'storage' Sep 19 16:56:17 storage sshd(pam_unix)[3124]: check pass; user unknown Sep 19 16:56:17 storage sshd(pam_unix)[3124]:

Heya, FREEBSD 4.9-STABLE Is there anyway to block SYN attacks and prevent it from bring down my server? Its been attacking for sometime.

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:00 PM JF Bastien via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Nov 18, 2019, at 2:42 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:31 PM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> One problem with defining away

Hello compiler enthusiasts, The Apple LLVM team would like to propose that a new a security process and an associated private LLVM Security Group be created under the umbrella of the LLVM project. A draft proposal for how we could organize such a group and what its process could be is available on Phabricator <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70326>. The proposal starts with a list of goals for

Hi all, I was wondering if someone could lend a little assistance. I recently setup SAMBA/Winbind to allow users to login to a Redhat 8 box using their Windows NT Domain credentials. All is working well in that regard. The issue I am having is getting regular UNIX based users to be able to login. The following is my PAM configuration. For example, if I try to login as root, it does not work.

I've installed SAMBA, Winbind etc and everything is working great for users to login with GDM using DOMAIN+username Although this is working, now I can no longer login as a generic Linux user (ex. root). The following is my GDM file from /etc/pam.d/gdm I wonder if someone might have a suggestion as to what it's missing to allow Linux users to login? #%PAM-1.0 auth required

List, I am unable to log into a terminal using Winbind service. I have the login file correctly modifyed and nsswitch too. I have the 2.2.5 version of SAMBA with the new winbind. SAMBA shares work great, so I think it is something else. I get this error in the messages log: Jul 9 11:46:01 alblinux sshd(pam_unix)[5463]: check pass; user unknown Jul 9 11:46:01 alblinux sshd(pam_unix)[5463]:

Copies heavily after a similar addition recently made in nbdkit. --- docs/Makefile.am | 7 +++++++ docs/libnbd-security.pod | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/libnbd.pod | 1 + Makefile.am | 1 + .gitignore | 3 ++- SECURITY | 14 ++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644

> We are trying to have linux authenticate to linux server running samba > 3.0. We have the XP Pro, 6.2 redhat, and 7.3 redhat machines. They all > authenticate to the linux server but we are having problems with blank > passwords or the user can type any password. We are using pam modules for > the authentication on the client machines. > I have included the config files for

Hello Folks, The official email address for this list is `freebsd-security@freebsd.org'. Due to convention, there is an email alias for this list: security@freebsd.org, just as there is for hackers@ & freebsd-hackers@, arch@ & freebsd-arch@, and so on. The security@freebsd.org alias has been the source of occassional problems. Several times in the past, postings have been made to

> -----Original Message----- > From: Reed, Tameika > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:56 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba PDC trying rid null logins > > > > > We are trying to have linux authenticate to linux server running samba > 3.0. We have the XP Pro, 6.2 redhat, and 7.3 redhat machines. They all > authenticate to the

I think it's great to make a policy for reporting security bugs. But first, yes, we need to be clear as to what sorts of things we consider as "security bugs", and what we do not. We need to be clear on this, both for users to know what they should depend on, and for LLVM contributors to know when they should be raising a flag, if they discover or fix something themselves. We could