search for: sectors

...for block group 82036391936 [ 33.552208] block group 83110133760 has an wrong amount of free space [ 33.552210] btrfs: failed to load free space cache for block group 83110133760 etc. block_dump said, during the problem: [83609.668785] btrfs-transacti(726): WRITE block 78521360 on dm-3 (112 sectors) [83609.668811] btrfs-transacti(726): WRITE block 78259328 on dm-3 (128 sectors) [83609.668814] btrfs-transacti(726): WRITE block 78521472 on dm-3 (128 sectors) [83609.668834] btrfs-submit-1(693): WRITE block 45092536 on dm-3 (1024 sectors) [83609.668839] btrfs-transacti(726): WRITE block 78259456...

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

Hi guys I gave these patches a try (on top of 2.6.23-rc9 plus the previously submitted 2.6.24 patch set). The last two seem to cause Badness on my system, whereby if I start a guest (using the same bzImage as the host, as before) it seems to boot OK, and the host system still superficially looks stable (my X session is OK and I can interact with existing processes) but if I attempt to launch any

Hi, I'm using the FLAC command line tool to encode my WAV files in some directory to FLAC files. Now I noticed sometimes the output of the tool is mostly like this: flac -V --best "14 The Hose - Time Warp (Old Skull Mix).wav" flac 1.1.4, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are

Hi Gang. I installed CentOS last night and the sound card detection failled to detect the sound card. I have a Asrock K8NF6G-VSTA mother board, with a nVidia NF6100-405 chip set. I have tried various live distro's and I ran Fedora 7 on it for just over 2 weeks and none of them detected the sound card. I'm a newbie to Red Hat based distributions but have been using Mandriva for

Hi Gang. I installed CentOS last night and the sound card detection failled to detect the sound card. I have a Asrock K8NF6G-VSTA mother board, with a nVidia NF6100-405 chip set. I have tried various live distro's and I ran Fedora 7 on it for just over 2 weeks and none of them detected the sound card. I'm a newbie to Red Hat based distributions but have been using Mandriva for

...nfatsize variable computed in libfat_open() when it is compared to the fatsize variable. If you use a Large FAT32 formatted drive, you will see that fatsize is always less than (unpatched) minfatsize by a difference of 1, and my understanding is that these values are expressed in number of FAT sectors. So I guess it'd probably be more accurate to say that what I found is that Large FAT32 formatted drives have one less sectors of FAT than SysLinux anticipates right now. To make this a bit more concrete, here is the debug output of a 100GB drive being formatted to Large FAT32 and then proc...

Hi all, I started playing a couple days ago with Rails and it find it very interesting. But I''m a bit stuck with making it work with a concatenated primary key. I want to use my own names for the DB fields and I''m using SQL Server 2005. My tables look roughly like this: CREATE TABLE USERS ( USR_ID VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, USR_PASS VARCHAR(25) ) CREATE TABLE

Dear All, I am having a very basic error, but somehow do not know how to resolve it. I've read a dataset in .csv into R with two columns - sector, export. When trying to plot the data it says "sector not found" This is the formula. SouthAfrica<-read.csv(c,header=T) > hist(sector$exports,xlab="exports (MtCO2)",main="CO2 Exports") Error in

...et up to have a logical volume passed in as xvdb). Sidenote: PVM guests that map files or volume directly to partitions may be accidentally ok as ext4 uses 4k blocks by default). What I am not sure about is whether this also is sufficient for handling migration (possible to another host with other sectors). But I think that the units of tables is still 512, only alignment is changed. So it should more or less work. How does this look to you? -Stefan From 6c200e6666cd4d632e2234d267e387b72d69a95c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013...

...|||____ S speed/performance ||_____ O updated online |______ P prefailure warning General Purpose Log Directory Version 1 SMART Log Directory Version 1 [multi-sector log support] GP/S Log at address 0x00 has 1 sectors [Log Directory] SMART Log at address 0x01 has 1 sectors [Summary SMART error log] SMART Log at address 0x02 has 5 sectors [Comprehensive SMART error log] GP Log at address 0x03 has 6 sectors [Ext. Comprehensive SMART error log] SMART Log at address 0x06 has 1 sectors [SMART self-test...

Hi everyone After the following setup sector=2 # Define Number of Sectors sectors=LETTERS[seq( from = 1, to = sector )] # Name sectors No_ent=round(3/runif(sector)) # Number of entities per sector #Tot_No_ent=sum(No_ent) Goal is to get a List like (A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, B3, B4) where A is denoting an industrial sector and then a numbered sequence of companies withi...

This is part of some patches to support sectors > 512. Currently I'm able to boot a Ubuntu kernel but seems that mboot is not working for some reason. This patch try to fix first stage of extlinux bootloader but have some problems with ADV Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio at citrix.com> --- dos/syslinux.c...

Well this is a new one.... Illumos/Openindiana let me add a device as a hot spare that evidently has a different sector alignment than all of the other drives in the array. So now I''m at the point that I /need/ a hot spare and it doesn''t look like I have it. And, worse, the other spares I have are all the same model as said hot spare. Is there anything I can do with this or

...art_size; - printf "\tpartition sector data: %Ld-%Ld\n" - (p.p_part.G.part_start /^ sectsize) (p.p_part.G.part_end /^ sectsize); - printf "\ttarget partition sector data: %Ld-%Ld \n" - p.p_target_start p.p_target_end; + printf "\tpartition sector data: %Ld-%Ld (%Ld sectors)\n" + (p.p_part.G.part_start /^ sectsize) (p.p_part.G.part_end /^ sectsize) + ((p.p_part.G.part_end -^ p.p_part.G.part_start) /^ sectsize +^ 1L); + printf "\ttarget partition sector data: %Ld-%Ld (%Ld sectors)\n" + p.p_target_start p.p_target_end (p.p_target_end -^ p.p_targ...

...s enough for a manufacturer to do a > warranty replacement. I agree with Matt. Go ahead and run a few of the S.M.A.R.T. tests. I can almost guarantee based off of your description of your problem that they will fail. badblocks(8) is a very antiquated tool. Almost every hard drive has a few bad sectors from the factory. Very old hard drives used to have a list of the bad sectors printed on the front of the label. When you first created a filesystem you had to enter all of the bad sectors from the label so that the filesystem wouldn't store data there. Years later, more bad sectors would form...

Hi, I'm trying to fit a model using variance components in R, but if very new on it, so I'm asking for your help. I have imported the SPSS database onto R, but I don't know how to convert the commands... the SPSS commands I'm trying to convert are: VARCOMP RATING BY CHAIN SECTOR RESP ASPECT ITEM /RANDOM = CHAIN SECTOR RESP ASPECT ITEM /METHOD = MINQUE (1) /DESIGN

...ed in libfat_open() when it is compared to the fatsize variable. > > If you use a Large FAT32 formatted drive, you will see that fatsize is > always less than (unpatched) minfatsize by a difference of 1, and my > understanding is that these values are expressed in number of FAT > sectors. So I guess it'd probably be more accurate to say that what I > found is that Large FAT32 formatted drives have one less sectors of FAT > than SysLinux anticipates right now. > > To make this a bit more concrete, here is the debug output of a 100GB > drive being formatted to...

This set of patches add some support for sector size >512. Currently it fixes extlinux, MBR for GPT and ext partitions. Other code is unaffected. This set of patches has been tested on a read Dell machine running a beta firmware.

On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:54, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >On 07/08/2014 11:26 AM, Ady wrote: >> >> It's interesting that you ask this, because every document related to >> newmkfloppyimg.sh specifically recommends adding: >> floppy c=$CYLINDERS s=$SECTORS h=$HEADS >> to the MEMDISK arguments. >> > >It would be important for floppies to know if the geometry that MEMDISK >guesses is the one that you actually intended. This will be in the >information that was snipped out. Ah, this might explain things although I don'...