search for: section00073000000000000000

I've got a question about the granulepos in speex packets. >From the speex manual (http://www.speex.org/manual2/node7.html#SECTION00073000000000000000): >The third and subsequent packets each contain one or more (number found in header) Speex frames. These are identified with packetno starting from 2 and the granulepos is the number of the last sample encoded in that packet. In experimenting however, it seems that the granulepos is only vali...

Hi guys, I'm writing an application that will sniff audio streams going across the network and allow a seperate client application to listen into one of these streams. I was looking into ways to distribute the captured stream media to a client for listening, and icecast came to mind. Icecast, as I understand it, is usually used for streaming a few data sources to MANY clients. As I want

...it would take up too much space). You can probably see how to use it by looking at speexdec.c Jean-Marc On jeu, 2004-09-16 at 23:19 -0700, Owen wrote: > I've got a question about the granulepos in speex packets. > > >From the speex manual (http://www.speex.org/manual2/node7.html#SECTION00073000000000000000): > > >The third and subsequent packets each contain one or more (number found in header) Speex frames. These are identified with packetno starting from 2 and the granulepos is the number of the last sample encoded in that packet. > > In experimenting however, it seems that the gra...

...someone that knew what they were doing. Would I be correct in my > assumption that the easiest way to do this would be to write a > format_speex.c and .h file from format_vorbis.c/.h that conforms to the > Speex in Ogg encapsulation spec at > http://www.speex.org/manual2/node7.html#SECTION00073000000000000000 ? > It also seems that libshout would require some slight modifications > (e.x. a new FORMAT_ specified for SPEEX). speex can be added easily enough, I already have it in my branch. I haven't had any feedback on it yet although the processing of it is very trivial. karl.

...ltipage comment packet, all but the last page have granulepos -1. Regardless of the above, I believe this is a speexenc bug. Either it should mark all these pages 0, or only allow one page. [0] http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet/wiki/Development/Mutagen [1] http://www.speex.org/manual2/node7.html#SECTION00073000000000000000 -- Joe Wreschnig <piman@sacredchao.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/...