search for: sectcreat

...ck to the normal object format? gcc main.c -Wl,-b -Wl,binary -Wl,picture.jpg -Wl,-b -Wl,<<something to undo binary mode?>> So, anyways, while this is _possible_ with objcopy, it'd sure be nice if you never needed to use it for that... (BTW, Apple ld actually has an option "-sectcreate SEGNAME SECTNAME INPUT_FILE", and the clang driver will pass it through to the linker.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170602/2a354042/attachment.html>

...any feedback from any MachO users. Generally, Mach-O tools separate the segment name and the section name as different entries on the command line. The “<Segment Name>,<Section Name>” string is almost always an output format. Some examples include: otool -s __TEXT __text /bin/ls ld -sectcreate __EXAMPLE __example /dev/zero ... In my opinion, that would be ideal from a "Mach-O users" point of view. That said, the “two arguments” pattern isn’t very common in llvm, although it does appear in places such as llvm-nm. llvm-objdump has a -section option that takes a single string...

...++11 raw string literal could bypass most of > the parsing overhead of a big array literal, but the people that care about > including a binary in their program probably don't care about that. > > -- Sean Silva > > >> >> (BTW, Apple ld actually has an option "-sectcreate SEGNAME SECTNAME >> INPUT_FILE", and the clang driver will pass it through to the linker.) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/...

Hi, I'm going to implement Mach-O support in llvm-objcopy. Before working on this, I'd like to hear your thoughts how llvm-objcopy should handle Mach-O section names. By convention, Mach-O section names are denoted by "<segment name>,<section name>". However, GNU objcopy renames them in the following rule [1]: - If the section name is well-known, rename it to an

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > OK. I see that the Mach-O linker is not even built when LLD is enabled in > Release_40, only the PE/COFF and ELF linkers are built. > > From looking at reviews it appears that Clang was able to be linked with > LLD on Darwin about 2 years ago, so Mach-O support seems to have

LLVM already implements its own version of almost all of binutils. The exceptions to this rule are objcopy and strip. This is a proposal to implement an llvm version of objcopy/strip to complete llvm’s binutils. Several projects only use gnu binutils because of objcopy/strip. LLVM itself uses objcopy in fact. Chromium and Fuchsia currently use objcopy as well. If you want to distribute your build