search for: secondarycache

Moved from PSARC to zfs-code...this discussion is seperate from the case. Eric kustarz wrote: > > On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:20 PM, Darren Reed wrote: > >> eric kustarz wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Darren Reed wrote: >>> >>>> Tim Haley wrote: >>>>> .... >>>>> primarycache=all | none | metadata

...users sharesmb name=users,guestok=true received remotepool/users refquota none default remotepool/users refreservation none default remotepool/users primarycache all default remotepool/users secondarycache all default remotepool/users usedbysnapshots 0 - remotepool/users usedbydataset 9.06G - remotepool/users usedbychildren 0 - remotepool/users usedbyrefreservation 0...

I had high hopes of significant performance gains using zfs diff in Solaris 11 compared to my home-brew stat based version in Solaris 10. However the results I have seen so far have been disappointing. Testing on a reasonably sized filesystem (4TB), a diff that listed 41k changes took 77 minutes. I haven''t tried my old tool, but I would expect the same diff to take a couple of

...off default pool1/fs1 sharesmb off default pool1/fs1 refquota none default pool1/fs1 refreservation none default pool1/fs1 primarycache all default pool1/fs1 secondarycache all default pool1/fs1 usedbysnapshots 0 - pool1/fs1 usedbydataset 21K - pool1/fs1 usedbychildren 0 - pool1/fs1 usedbyrefreservation 0 - pool1/fs1 logbias...

...data/admin/ENS sharesmb off default fsdata/admin/ENS refquota none default fsdata/admin/ENS refreservation none default fsdata/admin/ENS primarycache all default fsdata/admin/ENS secondarycache all default fsdata/admin/ENS usedbysnapshots 0 - fsdata/admin/ENS usedbydataset 73.6G - fsdata/admin/ENS usedbychildren 0 - fsdata/admin/ENS usedbyrefreservation 0 -...

...fault tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 refquota none default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 refreservation none default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 primarycache all default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 secondarycache all default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 usedbysnapshots 0 - tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 usedbydataset 16.4G - tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 usedbychildren 0...

...off default rpool refquota none default rpool refreservation none default rpool primarycache all default rpool secondarycache all default rpool usedbysnapshots 0 - rpool usedbydataset 81K - rpool usedbychildren 11,5G - rpool usedbyrefreserva...

We have a SunFire X4500 running Solaris 10U5 which does about 5-8k nfs ops of which about 90% are meta data. In hind sight it would have been significantly better to use a mirrored configuration but we opted for 4 x (9+2) raidz2 at the time. We can not take the downtime necessary to change the zpool configuration. We need to improve the meta data performance with little to no money. Does anyone

...default zhome/username sharesmb off default zhome/username refquota none default zhome/username refreservation none default zhome/username primarycache all default zhome/username secondarycache all default zhome/username usedbysnapshots 0 - zhome/username usedbydataset 750M - zhome/username usedbychildren 0 - zhome/username usedbyrefreservation 0 - Other p...

...read-ahead for > the Oracle > ZVOLS / folders by setting "primarycache" to "medata" and > thus using the > pressious main memory for metadata only (ZFS does a lot of > metadata > operastions, so having this in memory helps). If this does > not help, > secondarycache to "metadata" may be a good idea also. > > Maybe this helps, > Robert > > Brad schrieb: > > I''m running into a issue where there seems to be a > high number of read iops hitting disks and physical free > memory is fluctuating between 200MB -> 450MB...

Hello all, I''ve tried changing all kinds of attributes for the zfs''s, but I can''t seem to find the right configuration. So I''m trying to move some zfs''s under another, it looks like this: /pool/joe_user move to /pool/homes/joe_user I know I can do this with zfs rename, and everything is fine. The problem I''m having is, when I mount

Hi, I''m referring to; http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6977913 It should be in Solaris 11 Express, has anyone tried this? How this is supposed to work? Any documentation available? Yours Markus Kovero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, ZFS is behaving strange on a OSOL laptop, your thoughts are welcome. I am running OSOL on my laptop, currently b124 and i found that the performance of ZFS is not optimal in all situations. If i check the how much space the package cache for pkg(1) uses, it takes a bit longer on this host than on comparable machine to which i transferred all the data. user at host:/var/pkg$ time

Looking for help regaining access to encrypted ZFS file systems that stopped accepting the encryption key. I have a file server with a setup as follows: Solaris 11 Express 1010.11/snv_151a 8 x 2-TB disks, each one divided into three equal size partitions, three raidz3 pools built from a "slice" across matching partitions: Disk 1 Disk 8 zpools +--+ +--+ |p1| .. |p1| <-

...default rpool/export sharesmb off default rpool/export refquota none default rpool/export refreservation none default rpool/export primarycache all default rpool/export secondarycache all default rpool/export usedbysnapshots 0 - rpool/export usedbydataset 688M - rpool/export usedbychildren 21K - rpool/export usedbyrefreservation 0 - rpool/export log...

.../export/iscsi tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu copies 1 default tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu refreservation none default tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu primarycache all default tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu secondarycache all default tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu usedbysnapshots 0 - tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu usedbydataset 54.5K - tank/export/iscsi/acer-ubuntu usedbychildren 0 - tank/export/iscsi/acer-...

Hi all! I am running SXCE 121 on a dual quad-core X2200M2 (64 bit of course). During an installation of a NetBSD 5.0.1 PVM domU, the entire machine crashed with a kernel panic. Here''s what I managed to salvage from the LOM console of the machine: Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51712 (xdb5) offline Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51728 (xdb6) offline

I have a 5-500GB disk Raid-Z pool that has been producing checksum errors right after upgrading SXCE to build 121. They seem to be randomly occurring on all 5 disks, so it doesn''t look like a disk failure situation. Repeatingly running a scrub on the pools randomly repairs between 20 and a few hundred checksum errors. Since I hadn''t physically touched the machine, it seems a

I''m migrating to ZFS and Solaris for cluster computing storage, and have some completely static data sets that need to be as fast as possible. One of the scenarios I''m testing is the addition of vdevs to a pool. Starting out, I populated a pool that had 4 vdevs. Then, I added 3 more vdevs and would like to balance this data across the pool for performance. The data may be

Hi, I just installed 2009.06 and found that compression isn''t enabled by default when filesystems are created. Does is make sense to have an RFE open for this? (I''ll open one tonight if need be.) We keep telling people to turn on compression. Are there any situations where turning on compression doesn''t make sense, like rpool/swap? what about rpool/dump? Thanks, ~~sa