search for: secificly

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "secificly".

Did you mean: specificly
2018 Mar 22
4
limit pop login per user and per minute
Hi, like I have written in the subject line I want to limit the pop login per user and per minute. Currently I am having several customers which are fetching their email with popcon (MS Exchange). This has never been a problem. But... They all have got the same "technician" which take care of their systems. The problem is, that he misconfigured the servers of these customers. In
2018 Mar 22
0
limit pop login per user and per minute
Am 22.03.2018 um 11:21 schrieb Markus Eckerl: > Hi, > > like I have written in the subject line I want to limit the pop login > per user and per minute. > > Currently I am having several customers which are fetching their email > with popcon (MS Exchange). > > This has never been a problem. But... They all have got the same > "technician" which take care
2005 Feb 15
2
reducing the stack size
hi all, the stacksize required for encoder and decoder are 32Kbytes and 16 Kbyes respectively. i changed it to 20Kbytess and 8Kbytes and it seems to work. but need to trim further. can someone point me in the right direction to further reducing the stack size? thanks! cheers, tk
2005 Oct 14
2
subset selection for glm
Hello: Are there any libraries that will do a subset selection for glm's? I looked through leaps, but seems like it is specifically for linear regressions. Thank you. -Dhiren
2006 Aug 07
0
integration test won''t run
Im trying to write and run integration tests in my app, but they keep failing with an error like "uninitialized constant IntegrationTest" secificly: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.1/lib/ active_support/dependencies.rb:123:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant IntegrationTest (NameError) I tried creating a fresh rails app and was able to run an integration test from there. I also tried updating to edg...
2014 Jun 18
4
R128gain & metaflac
>b) According to http://wiki.xiph.org/OggOpus#Comment_Header >there should be no REPLAYGAIN_*** tags in Opus files; Opus uses >R128_TRACK_GAIN tag. If some audio player reads Opus tags then it should >be aware of the difference between ReplayGain and R128. But this doesn't >require REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS tag. > > The Opus replaygain spec is fundamentally broken, so