Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "secd".
Did you mean:
sec
2009 Jan 19
1
Cisco 7941G-GE with Asterisk and CTPSEP odyssee
...t; > > > NOT 09:28:49.059960 DHCP: Default Gwy -
> > > > NOT 09:28:49.073169 PAE: SIGIPCFG received...
> > > > NOT 09:28:49.075897 ESP: send ADMIN, logging = 1, shell = 0,
ipconfig
> > > =
> > > > 1
> > > > WRN 09:28:49.120127 SECD: WARN:getCTLInfo: ** phone has no CTL
> > > > WRN 09:28:49.127292 SECD: WARN:getCTLInfo: ** phone has no CTL
> > > > NOT 09:28:49.140946 CDP-D: catchipcfg getdhcpinfo IP:
a0a0af7 Chng:1
> > > > NOT 09:28:49.152532 tftpClient: request server 0 --->
10.1...
2008 Oct 17
2
problem usrmgr Version 3.2.4
hi , i have
a few problems with usmgr on Version 3.2.4
( Version 3.2.4-8.1-1931-SUSE-SL11.0 )
samba pdc ldap
the download version from ms
http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c0011ab8-3178-4701-a791-eafba0f42de2&displaylang=en
doesnt work
giving
"device attached to the system is not functioning"
whatever i do
a old version from usermgr works partially
but magic
2013 Jul 26
0
[codec] Some listening test results
...the packet (see slide 46 of
<http://www.celt-codec.org/presentations/misc/lca-celt.pdf> for some
early measurements on the CELT layer from my 2009 LCA talk). This takes
advantage of the unequal error protection afforded by Trellis Coded
Modulation (TCM), and in other modulation schemes a SECDED code on the
first 64 bits or so of the packet should substantially cure the bulk of
bit-error impairment.
As Ron notes, the choice of modulation scheme or error protection scheme
is best dealt with at a layer above the codec itself. We just tried to
make it easy to do so. I guess you can arg...
2013 Jul 26
0
[codec] Some listening test results
Hi Christian,
Thanks for publishing this. Do you happen to have some numbers on
what the expected bit error rates are for a "typical AMR-WB usage
scenario"?
I'm curious about that because you note that the Opus bitstream
wasn't designed to be inherently robust against a bit error at
any point in the packet (and some places will obviously effect
it worse than others) - however
2010 May 31
2
CELT in Digital Radio Mondiale
Dear CELT Developers,
I wrote a proposal on how to integrate CELT into Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM+). The CELT codec has been integrated in the Spark transmission software and SoDiRa receiver software.
Please download the proposal here:
http://www.drm-sender.de/celt_in_drm.pdf
Suggestions and comments are welcome!
A live on-air DRM+ transmission using CELT (v.0.7.1) for audio encoding was
2013 Jul 26
4
Some listening test results
Hi,
a first set of results can be downloaded here
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults>
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/wiki/TestingResults
More will be added soon.
Thanks to Patrick Schreiner and Alfons Martin, who did the tests.
With best regards,
Christian Hoene
Symonics GmbH
Sand 13
72076 T?bingen
Tel +49 7071 5681302
2012 Sep 07
2
Contrasts for 2x4 interaction in mixed effects model
Hello everyone,
I am running a mixed effects model where I have two fixed factors, one with
2 levels and one with 4, and their interaction. Let's say these are my
factors and their levels:
FirstFactor: 1, 2
SecondFactor: A, B, C, D
For the interaction, I am interested in the four two-way comparisons, not
the two four-way comparisons. In other words, I want to test whether 1A is
2017 Oct 20
2
Samba 4.6.7 AD, Netapp CDOT 9.2 and missing "Domain Users" membership
...),3000023(COMPANYAD\noc),3000035(BUILTIN\backup
operators),3000009(BUILTIN\users)
_________________________________________________________________________
but from the netapp one the user has less groups:
_________________________________________________________________________
filer::*> diag secd authentication show-creds -node filer-node2 -vserver
cifs-node1-sata -win-name testuser
UNIX UID: pcuser <> Windows User: COMPANYAD\testuser (Windows Domain User)
GID: pcuser
Supplementary GIDs:
pcuser
Windows Membership:
COMPANYAD\test_share (Windows Domain group)
COMPANYAD\noc...
2012 Jan 15
22
Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot? If yes - how?
"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?"
That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula
that I have lately.
Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write
hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity
data, doesn''t get written - leading to invalid data upon read).
In general, I think the same applies to bitrot of
2007 Oct 24
182
Yager on ZFS
Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down...
http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html
Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows
solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing
comment:
"If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually
become ubiquitously implemented