search for: secb

...I don't think this analysis is correct. Assume a 1M branch displacement > for short jumps. Consider: > > secA: 512K (contains a jump "jumpA" at offset 0 that needs a thunk (it > doesn't matter where it needs to jump to, just that it definitely needs a > thunk)) > secB: 512K > secC: 512K (contains a jump "jumpC" at offset 0 that jumps to offset 0 in > secA (i.e., just barely in range of a short jump)) > > If the thunk for jumpA is placed between secB and secC (as it would be > based on your description) it will push the branch at the begi...

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> Hello Rui, >> >> Thanks for the comments >> >> - Synthetic sections and rewriting relocations >> I think that this would definitely be worth trying. It should

Hello everyone, I am running a mixed effects model where I have two fixed factors, one with 2 levels and one with 4, and their interaction. Let's say these are my factors and their levels: FirstFactor: 1, 2 SecondFactor: A, B, C, D For the interaction, I am interested in the four two-way comparisons, not the two four-way comparisons. In other words, I want to test whether 1A is

......p.SAMSUNG E 2300: 6c 65 63 74 72 6f 6e 69 63 73 00 88 42 41 54 49 lectronics..BATI 2310: 0a 0c 00 a4 42 41 54 49 08 53 54 41 54 12 06 04 ....BATI.STAT... 2320: 00 00 00 00 14 45 1c 5f 42 53 54 00 a0 4a 0c 93 .....E._BST..J.. 2330: 45 43 4f 4e 00 70 53 45 43 42 0a 81 0a 84 60 a0 ECON.pSECB....`. 2340: 1c 90 92 93 60 00 92 93 60 0a 05 a0 0b 93 50 57 ....`...`.....PW 2350: 52 53 01 70 0a 02 60 a1 04 70 01 60 70 60 88 53 RS.p..`..p.`p`.S 2360: 54 41 54 00 00 70 53 45 43 57 0a 82 0a a4 00 60 TAT..pSECW.....` 2370: a0 13 93 60 0b ff ff 70 0c ff ff ff ff 88 53 54 ...`...p.........