search for: sebode

Hey Robert, thanks for your reply. Am 17.02.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Robert L Mathews: > Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here: > > ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/chain.pem > ssl_key = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/key.pem > > Are you sure these two files match, and contain the right things in the > right order? > Yes, unfortunately I'm sure that everything has the right order. As you can see in the trace, both certificates (mi...

...d also in a fresh installation. After two weeks of investigating I still have no clue why it behaves like this. I uploaded two Wireshark tracefiles, further logs and dovecot -n, may be someone sees any possible reasons for this weird behavior or has any further tips on solving this issue. https://sebode-online.de/dovecot-letsencrypt/ Every hint is highly appreciated! Best Regards Bastian -- Bastian Sebode Fachinformatiker Systemintegration LINET Services GmbH | Cyriaksring 10a | 38118 Braunschweig Tel. 0531-180508-0 | Fax 0531-180508-29 | http://www.linet-services.de LINET in den sozialen Ne...

...17 um 21:58 schrieb Aki Tuomi: > Usually with LE, the filename is fullchain.pem, not chain.pem. > > Can you please doublecheck this? > > Also, try > > openssl s_client -connect hostname:143 -starttls imap > > Aki > >> On February 17, 2017 at 10:31 PM Bastian Sebode <b.sebode at linet-services.de> wrote: >> >> >> Hey Robert, >> >> thanks for your reply. >> >> Am 17.02.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Robert L Mathews: >>> Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here: >>> >>&g...

Usually with LE, the filename is fullchain.pem, not chain.pem. Can you please doublecheck this? Also, try openssl s_client -connect hostname:143 -starttls imap Aki > On February 17, 2017 at 10:31 PM Bastian Sebode <b.sebode at linet-services.de> wrote: > > > Hey Robert, > > thanks for your reply. > > Am 17.02.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Robert L Mathews: > > Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here: > > > > ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/sebod...

On 2/17/17 8:58 AM, Bastian Sebode wrote: > I uploaded two Wireshark tracefiles, further logs and dovecot -n Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here: ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/chain.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/key.pem Are you sure these two files match, and contain...

...http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-July/097133.html * http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/123367/thunderbird-fails-to-connect-to-dovecot-and-postfix -- Yassine On Friday, February 17, 2017 7:29 PM, Robert L Mathews <lists at tigertech.com> wrote: On 2/17/17 8:58 AM, Bastian Sebode wrote: > I uploaded two Wireshark tracefiles, further logs and dovecot -n Looking at your dovecot -n, you're using two different files here: ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/chain.pem ssl_key = </etc/ssl/sebode-online.de/key.pem Are you sure these two files match, and contain...

Hello, I had the same problem. LE is not in the CA list. Best Regards, On 17.02.2017 17:58, Bastian Sebode wrote: > Hello Folks, > > my StartCom SSL-Certificate expires soon and so I wanted to switch to > Let's Encrypt Certificates instead. Unfortunatelly Thunderbird seems not > to like it, although all -tested- other Clients work without any problems. > > When I connect with Th...

Hello Basti. Maybe you tried LE too early when it was not universally accepted as a trusted CA ? On Monday, February 20, 2017 2:22 PM, basti <basti at unix-solution.de> wrote: Hello, I had the same problem. LE is not in the CA list. Best Regards, On 17.02.2017 17:58, Bastian Sebode wrote: > Hello Folks, > > my StartCom SSL-Certificate expires soon and so I wanted to switch to > Let's Encrypt Certificates instead. Unfortunatelly Thunderbird seems not > to like it, although all -tested- other Clients work without any problems. > > When I connect with Th...

hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.