search for: searche

Hello all, ? this is my first Post in a Mailing List I hope everything goes fine. ? We are running a Samba 4 DC (4.0.14, Version 4.1.4 has the same problem) as a second DC in our Windows Environment. This server is in a second site. ? So after a while Samba 4 hangs and it is not possible to talk to the server via the RPC Protocol. So all samba-tools Commands like ?samba-tool drs showrepl? run

Hello. Samba 4.1.0pre1-GIT-aad669b, joined as a DC to an existing domain. At least 6 accounts behave like this: Kerberos: AS-REQ techgroup at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM from ipv4:192.168.1.31:33822 for krbtgt/KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: <rootDSE> scope: sub expr: (&(objectClass=user)(userPrincipalName=techgroup at KLIN.KIFATO-MK.COM)) control:

Hi, I want to allow users ti search my blog. I have the following code below to initiate the form. <%= start_form_tag :action => ''search'', :search => search %> <p align =center><%= text_field ''search'', ''search'',"size" =>"20" %> <%= submit_tag ''Search'' %></p>

...search.term,names) #but I cannot get it to work for the more difficult example in which I want to do something like grep(^search.term,names) grep("^search.term",names) grep("^"search.term,names) #Implying that the search term must be the first part of the string that is being searched #Ultimately, I need to to loop over several strings stored in search.term, for example, names=c("Emil Jannings","Charles Chaplin","Katherine Hepburn","Meryl Streep") search.term=c("Emil","Meryl") for(i in 1:length(names)){ print(g...

Hello, New subscriber here. I noticed that the FTS index is not used in compound searches. Is this expected? Tested in 2.0.0 and 2.0.8: . search BODY "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (0.000 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" FROM "waldo" * SEARCH . OK Search completed (1.768 secs). . SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 OR SUBJECT "waldo" B...

do I somehow have to add RID's? [root@linserv2 sbin]# ldapsearch -x -h localhost -b "o=Mullen,c=US" '(cn=Domain Admins)' version: 2 # # filter: (cn=Domain Admins) # requesting: ALL # # Domain Admins, Groups, Mullen, US dn: cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,o=Mullen,c=US objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: sambaGroupMapping gidNumber: 512 cn: Domain Admins memberUid:

...\Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted. * 10 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UNSEEN 1] First unseen. * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1190450101] UIDs valid * OK [UIDNEXT 11] Predicted next UID a OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed. Now, start doing some basic searches using message sets: b search (1:10) * SEARCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 b OK Search completed. OK, so far so good. Try the inverse: c search not (1:10) * SEARCH c OK Search completed. OK. d search not (1,10) * SEARCH d OK Search completed. Hmm, should have output 2..9. e search no...

...it appears that the built-in search inside message bodies works too, but very slow (it seems that is because it is dumb file-based search and does not use indexes at all) So, my question is: is it possible to combine the built-in search with Solr or Lucene plugin-based search so that the first one searches by headers, and the second one works by bodies? This could make the advantages of both search methods combined. WBR, valery

Hello, Realized update dovecot on my server. Now the search is returning differently from the previous version bringing reference information of other messages . For example when doing a search for anderson.joao this new version of the dovecot dovecot 2.2.21 + fts - Solr response will be all email that has the word anderson and joao, instead of returning only items with the word anderson.joao.

Hi, GVN seems to be running in an infinite loop on my example. I have attached the output of one iteration. I cant seem to reduce the testcase either. Any pointers to how to reduce the test case. THanks, Arushi GVN iteration: 8 GVN WIDENED LOAD: %0 = load i8* getelementptr inbounds (%struct.CHESS_POSITION* @search, i64 0, i32 23), align 2, !dbg !875 TO: %1 = load i16* bitcast (i8*

Hi, I have a problem creating an new instance of an object using params posted from a form. The object being created is not a sub class of ActiveRecord and is very simple. It''s model file is just: class Search attr_accessor :major_build_id, :minor_build_id, :environment_id, :system_id end The controller creates an empty instance variable the first time the page is called, else

...browser session), the java search applet has to be loaded. This takes several seconds. 2. If you use a different operating system, a different version of R, or install R in a different location, change the bookmark path to the "SearchObject" file as appropriate. 3. By default this only searches Help page titles. You may prefer a more comprehensive search that includes Keywords and Object names. Edit the SearchObject.html file and change 'false' to 'true' in the following line: line = line + document.SearchEngine.search (searchstring,true,true,true); Here are my R a...

Sorry if this is a repost .. I have edited my query a little bit and my previous post was too long and so was waiting approval(I cancelled it) Ok. Another question.. I have installed the Search ::Xapian on my local machine. Now I'm trying to install it on a machine where i dont have root access. So while running configure of the Xapian library I gave the -prefix option and everything installed

I may have run across a bug in Ferret: if throws a segmentation fault when I try to create a Sort object using the default fields (SCORE and DOC_ID), but setting reverse to true. Here''s the minimal example: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require ''rubygems'' require ''ferret'' Ferret::Search::Sort.new Ferret::Search::Sort.new( [

I have a search page with a text_field as below <%= text_field ''program'', ''program_name'' %> After I perform the search in my controller I go to a search results view which shows search results and uses Rails pagination. Now how to pass the search paramters (i.e. params[:program][:program_name] in my controller) to the pagination links (next and

...s fine. I have the following in my game.rb: def self.search(search) if search find(:all, :conditions => [''game_name LIKE ? OR genre LIKE ? OR console LIKE ?'', "%#{search}%", "#{search}", "#{search}"]) else find(:all) end end No that searches fine but my problem is that if there is a record in game_name that has the words playstation in it will finish the search there and only return that record rather than that as well as all games that have playstation stored in console. Now I understand that is because I have OR in my conditions but...

Hello all, I wanted to announce a new R search engine I made that covers all the major R mailing lists, CRAN, r-project.org, and more. Results are tabbed, so you can refine the search. Current refinements include searching just the mailing lists, searching just introductions, and searching the web for source files ending in .R. Please send comments and suggestions. If you want to add sites to

I just tried out 1.0beta7 and erased all my indexes and with fts and fts_squat enabled, and when I SEARCH TEXT in Dovecot, it does *not* find messages where the thing I SEARCH for appear only in the From: header. Timo, can you confirm or deny that you still see this behavior? I did clear my indexes before doing it. -- Asheesh. -- Man is the measure of all things. -- Protagoras

I realize thi may be more complex issue than can be asnwered in this post. But, what I need to do is create a simple query on my existing tables via a search form. I have half my app done (I can write all the info I want to my database), but pulling the data out dynamically is giving me trouble. I have both the "ruby for rails" book and the Agile Development book. They both give

In the ''basecamp'' product from 37signals if I search for ''ruby'' the I get a bunch of results. In the search result page the search term (ruby in this case) is highlighted. I was wondering how to accomplish the same. How to highlight the ''search term'' in the search result? Is there any already existing utility that I could use? Thanks.